IRS Tax Code and Money Earned Abroad – Could it Change?

Money earned abroad by American corporations is free from U.S. taxes until it is returned to the United States. However, once these foreign earnings are repatriated, they are taxed at a rate of 35%. The current tax code allows multinational companies to avoid this tax, but only if they invest in certain domestic assets such as bank deposits, stocks and bonds. If the foreign earnings are reinvested into the companies themselves, they are taxed at the corporate tax rate of 35%. Currently, a group of multinational companies who have joined together to form what is called the Win America Coalition, is lobbying Congress to reduce the tax rate on earnings they bring home from overseas. This group of companies, which consists mainly of the Silicon Valley technology giants together with some pharmaceutical companies, is asking for the tax rate on repatriated foreign earnings to be reduced from 35% to just over 5%. They claim that a reduction in the tax rate would increase hiring and stimulate job growth by allowing companies to invest in themselves. While some members of both major political parties are in favor of such a tax cut, others are against it. The pros and cons are outlined below.

Reasons for favoring a tax cut on repatriated foreign earnings:

• Due to a flawed U.S. tax code, profits of U.S. companies continue to be invested around the world instead of at home.

• Even though companies are allowed to keep funds earned abroad in U.S. banks, they are not able to put the funds to work in the U.S. economy without being subjected to a 35% tax rate.

• Reducing the tax rate for repatriated funds earned abroad would inject billions of dollars into the U.S economy, thus creating jobs.

Reasons for opposing a tax cut on repatriated foreign earnings:

• Domestic companies that do not have overseas operations say it is unfair to give multinational companies a lower tax rate.

• Some analysts say that job growth created by a tax cut would be lower than some estimates predict because foreign earnings are already invested in U.S. stocks and bonds and deposited in U.S. banks.

• Independent tax analysts have said that when a similar tax cut was initiated in 2004, most of the repatriated funds were spent on shareholder dividends, stock buybacks and executive pay rather than on any type of expansion that would have created jobs.

According to recent report by the Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, large multinational companies are already investing nearly $250 billion in United States financial institutions in order to avoid paying the 35% tax rate on repatriated foreign earnings. The question is whether a reduction in the current rate would promote changes in the distribution of these funds that would be beneficial to the economy.

Do you have a tax planning or preparation question?  Are you thinking about your 2011 taxes and want to avoid owing the IRS a tax debt?  Call for a free, no obligation tax consultation with our CPA’s today (877) 889-6527 or email us at info@protaxres.com

Start of 2012 with clear and accurate tax advice – contact us today!

 

Back Taxes and Small Businesses -Tips to Avoid Tax Debt

Back Tax Issues for Small Businesses

What back tax issues are commonly encountered by small businesses?

Due to the complexity of tax law, many small business owners do not know how to use available deductions to reduce their lax liability and therefore end up with tax balances that are more than the business can afford to pay.

With the current state of the economy, many small businesses have cash flow problems. When this is the case, they may use available cash to fund operations rather than making tax payments.

What types of tax payments are small businesses responsible for?

Small businesses are responsible for paying sales taxes (often to multiple states), payroll taxes and quarterly tax payments.

What are the consequences when small businesses do not make their tax payments on time?

The IRS has the power to impose harsh penalties when small businesses fail to meet their tax deadlines. The reason for the delinquency is usually not taken into consideration.

One of the harshest penalties is imposed when a small business fails to meet its payroll tax deadlines. The penalty is called the Trust Fund recovery Penalty and is equal to 100 percent of the payroll tax balance. This penalty does not take into account the reason for the delinquency and can assign blame to anyone who was, in any way, responsible for the payroll tax debt.

What solutions are available to small businesses with back tax issues?

The best way for a small business to deal with a back tax issue is to face it head on rather than to wait for the liability to increase due to the compounding of interest and penalties.

Many states offer voluntary reporting programs and, while no such program is currently offered by the IRS, they due offer numerous tax debt settlement options.

While small business owners may rationalize that they will clear up their tax debt issues down the road when business is more profitable, this is usually not a wise decision. The IRS is more likely to approve a settlement agreement when business income and profits are low, not to mention that he legal and financial consequences of not addressing a back tax issue can be severe.

Due to the complexity of tax law, especially as it applies to small businesses, the best approach to resolving back tax issues is often to enlist the help of a qualified tax professional.

If you are a small business with unresolved tax debt, our experiences professionals can help you resolve your back tax issues. For more information about our tax debt resolution services, call us by phone at (877) 889-6527 to receive a free, no obligation consultation.

Business Tax Debt from Back Payroll Taxes is Devastating to Staff and Owners.

In light of the current economic slowdown and the tightening of credit, it is more common than ever for employers find themselves burdened with unpaid payroll taxes. Business owners generally match the employment taxes withheld from their employees’ pay checks and remit those to the IRS along with the standard federal and state tax withholdings.  When times are tough, it is not uncommon for an employer to delay in paying its payroll tax withholdings in the hope of being able to send them later when circumstances have improved. (thereader.com)  A business owner may simply be waiting for a contractor or client to pay an invoice or for the bank to approve a short term loan. If one of these improvements doesn’t materialize, the business can unintentionally be left unable to pay the back payroll taxes and can suddenly face a very sizable and unexpected tax debt.

No matter what the cause, delinquent payroll tax returns and unpaid payroll taxes can cause a host of problems. Some portion of a company’s payroll taxes are amounts withheld from employees’ wages to pay their share of federal withholding taxes, Social Security and FICA.  In other words, a portion of the total amount owed is actually the employee’s money that the employer is holding in trust to remit to the IRS or State Tax Agency on the employee’s behalf.  If a company fails to file a payroll tax return or pay its payroll taxes, the employee’s IRS and State accounts will not be credited at tax filing time. 

Because payroll taxes include amounts withheld from an employee’s wages and held in trust by the employer, the IRS pursues collection of a payroll tax debt much more aggressively than it does other tax delinquencies. To encourage compliance with the timely payment of withheld income, employment and social security taxes, the IRS has created a unique and potentially devastating penalty called the Trust Fund Recovery Penalty.  This penalty can be assessed against any person responsible for remitting payroll tax payments and can be assessed whether or not the business continues to operate. Since the IRS defines a responsible person as any person or group of people who have the power to direct, collect, account for or pay trust fund taxes, that person may fit any one of the following descriptions:

  • A corporate director or shareholder
  • An employee or officer of the business or corporation
  • A partnership member or employee
  • A board member of a non-profit organization
  • Any other person with control or authority over the payment of the taxes

In addition to the steep Trust Fund Recovery Penalties, the collection process for payroll tax debt is accelerated and settlement agreements are much more difficult to obtain.

Due to the combined effect of the factors discussed in the previous paragraph, a payroll tax debt can potentially result in the downfall of an otherwise successful business. In light of this risk, our firm always advises financially troubled business owners to make every effort to comply with all payroll tax filing deadlines and to pay the related taxes in a timely fashion.  If a payroll tax debt already exists, we encourage prompt action as the best way to get control of the situation and obtain tax relief. Tax debts arising from unpaid payroll taxes can be very significant since they include the assessment of a substantial Trust Fund Recovery Penalty in addition to the standard failure to file penalties, late payment penalties and interest assessed on the unpaid balance.  Obviously the larger the tax debt, the more difficult it can be for a smaller company to recover and find tax relief.

If you are a business with a payroll tax debt, we can help you evaluate the available tax settlement options and resolve your payroll tax debt problem. Because we know the collection laws and have experience negotiating with the IRS, we are in a better position than an individual taxpayer to stop enforced collection activity and to arrive at a reasonable tax settlement with the IRS. For more information about our tax debt resolution services, visit us today at www.professionaltaxresolution.com. With over 16 years of experience, we will negotiate with the IRS on your behalf. Contact us by phone at (949)-596-4143 or by email at info@protaxres.com to receive a free, no obligation consultation.

 

Complicated Tax Settlements and Returns Are Our Specialty. We Found This Client $75,000!

There are many types of accounting, tax and tax settlement service providers. CPAs and accounting firms typically provide tax preparation services to businesses and individuals but rarely devote much effort to actual tax settlements. On the other hand, tax resolution and tax settlement firms focus mostly on settling outstanding tax debt without ensuring that all available tax code benefits have been used on the original tax filings. Professional Tax Resolution combines the expertise of tax settlement professionals and experienced, licensed tax preparers. The first step in any tax settlement case should be to confirm that the reported tax liability is correct and that all available tax code benefits have been utilized. Following that, a tax debt resolution plan can be mapped out.

Jeff F. came to us shortly before the April 15th filing deadline. A successful chiropractor, Jeff had made large tax payments for himself and his corporation for many years. However, he owed a large tax liability for the previous year and had failed to make estimated tax payments for the current year. We told Jeff that we would be happy to prepare his individual and corporate tax returns and suggest a tax settlement option for the balances owed. Although his original tax filings had been prepared by two well established CPA firms, we suggested that we would review them prior to recommending a tax settlement plan just to confirm that the balances owed were correct and that no tax code benefits had been missed.

After reviewing the most recent returns, it appeared that, as expected, the returns had been filed properly. However, one important tax benefit had been overlooked. Jeff’s business is located within an Enterprise Zone that offers specific state tax benefits for companies located within the zone. One of the benefits is a state hiring credit made available to employers meeting certain specific criteria. Companies who qualify but have failed to claim this credit are permitted to amend returns and claim missed credits providing the returns are filed within the statutory amendment period. The vouchering process to obtain these credits is fairly involved and takes several months to complete but we determined that the potential tax benefits were worth the time and expense.

After several months of reviewing employee qualifications we were able to obtain qualifying vouchers and identify over $75,000 in unclaimed state tax credits for prior year’s tax returns. The best news was that the returns fell within the statutory amendment period so the refunds could still be claimed. In addition, the credits would apply to subsequent years so the client would be able to claim as much as $15,000 in tax credits for each year going forward. While these refunds only applied to state tax balances, the client was able to use the past refunds to pay outstanding IRS balances.

Complicated tax settlements are what we do at Professional Tax Resolution. This is yet another example of how a qualified tax settlement firm can provide real solutions to taxpayers faced with a significant amount of IRS tax debt.