IRS Tax Code and Money Earned Abroad – Could it Change?

Money earned abroad by American corporations is free from U.S. taxes until it is returned to the United States. However, once these foreign earnings are repatriated, they are taxed at a rate of 35%. The current tax code allows multinational companies to avoid this tax, but only if they invest in certain domestic assets such as bank deposits, stocks and bonds. If the foreign earnings are reinvested into the companies themselves, they are taxed at the corporate tax rate of 35%. Currently, a group of multinational companies who have joined together to form what is called the Win America Coalition, is lobbying Congress to reduce the tax rate on earnings they bring home from overseas. This group of companies, which consists mainly of the Silicon Valley technology giants together with some pharmaceutical companies, is asking for the tax rate on repatriated foreign earnings to be reduced from 35% to just over 5%. They claim that a reduction in the tax rate would increase hiring and stimulate job growth by allowing companies to invest in themselves. While some members of both major political parties are in favor of such a tax cut, others are against it. The pros and cons are outlined below.

Reasons for favoring a tax cut on repatriated foreign earnings:

• Due to a flawed U.S. tax code, profits of U.S. companies continue to be invested around the world instead of at home.

• Even though companies are allowed to keep funds earned abroad in U.S. banks, they are not able to put the funds to work in the U.S. economy without being subjected to a 35% tax rate.

• Reducing the tax rate for repatriated funds earned abroad would inject billions of dollars into the U.S economy, thus creating jobs.

Reasons for opposing a tax cut on repatriated foreign earnings:

• Domestic companies that do not have overseas operations say it is unfair to give multinational companies a lower tax rate.

• Some analysts say that job growth created by a tax cut would be lower than some estimates predict because foreign earnings are already invested in U.S. stocks and bonds and deposited in U.S. banks.

• Independent tax analysts have said that when a similar tax cut was initiated in 2004, most of the repatriated funds were spent on shareholder dividends, stock buybacks and executive pay rather than on any type of expansion that would have created jobs.

According to recent report by the Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, large multinational companies are already investing nearly $250 billion in United States financial institutions in order to avoid paying the 35% tax rate on repatriated foreign earnings. The question is whether a reduction in the current rate would promote changes in the distribution of these funds that would be beneficial to the economy.

Do you have a tax planning or preparation question?  Are you thinking about your 2011 taxes and want to avoid owing the IRS a tax debt?  Call for a free, no obligation tax consultation with our CPA’s today (877) 889-6527 or email us at info@protaxres.com

Start of 2012 with clear and accurate tax advice – contact us today!

 

Have IRS Tax Debt? Need a New Passport? The GAO wants to know.

As of the end of fiscal 2010, the balance of reported unpaid federal taxes was about $330 billion according to the IRS. This is a huge amount and as we have written about in the past, the enforcement of the tax laws and the tax code is on Government Accountability Office’s list of high-risk areas.  The deficit being what it is it may come as no surprise that the GAO was asked to investigate, by cross referencing unpaid federal taxes and passport issuance, the magnitude of known unpaid federal taxes for individuals who were issued passports.  Selecting a past year, the GAO did a study for the fiscal year 2008 to identify examples of passport recipients who had known unpaid federal taxes.

They study discovered that individual states issued passports to about 16 million individuals during fiscal year 2008 and that of these, over 224,000 individuals (over 1 percent) owed more than $5.8 billion in unpaid federal taxes. That is JUST those individuals who got new passports in 2008 – not all passport holders.

Does that come as a surprise? Currently each state is not authorized to restrict the issuance of a passport to an individual because they owe federal taxes. In addition, federal law does not permit the IRS to disclose taxpayer information, including unpaid federal taxes to State officials unless the taxpayer consents. The reason this is at least somewhat surprising is that in contrast, federal law does permit certain other restrictions on the issuance of passports to individuals, such as for those individuals owing child support debts over $2,500.

Really, the problem is likely far greater than 1% of the newly issued passport holding population.  In addition to the obvious population balance of all valid passport holders for the studied year of 2008, the estimated amount of unpaid federal taxes was actually likely understated because it excluded individuals who had not yet filed tax returns or who had underreported income.

Making matters harder, individual States currently cannot compel a passport applicant to provide a Social Security Number (SSN). Because the IRS uses the SSN to identify each taxpayer, without an SSN you cannot match an individual back to their IRS data.

This study had produced such alarming results already and the GAO wanted to know a bit more. They took the 2008 study and dug deeper into the backgrounds of a very small group of just 25 passport recipients. Clearly this is a tiny study and cannot be reflective of the population as a whole. That said, some pretty interesting things were discovered.  When investigating for abuse related to the federal tax system or criminal activity, of these 25 cases, at least 10 passport recipients had been indicted or convicted of federal laws! In addition, the IRS had assessed trust fund recovery penalties on several passport recipients; a penalty which is applied when an individual does not remit payroll taxes to the federal government.  How does someone fall behind on Payroll taxes?  Instead of acting appropriately as the trustee of an individual employee’s withholding and forwarding it onto IRS, they divert the money for other purposes. Using payroll taxes is a big crime; in fact the willful failure to remit payroll taxes is a felony underU.S.law.

In this smaller study of the 2008, of those 25 new passport holders, some had accumulated substantial wealth and assets, including million-dollar houses and luxury vehicles, all while failing to pay their federal taxes. In fact, of the 25, at least 16 passport recipients traveled outside the country all while owing federal taxes and another 4 passport recipients actually resided in another country at the time! Worse yet, two individuals used the identities of deceased people to fraudulently obtain passports in the first place and then used the passports to travel toMexico,France, and Africa. Ironically in one case, the unpaid tax debt belonged to a deceased individual and in the other; the debt was actually incurred by the imposter.

If this small study is any indication, there appears to be a big opportunity to crack down on passport issuance for those who owe federal tax debt. Although nothing official has been implemented to date, Congress could pursue policy to link federal tax debt collection and passport issuance by enabling States to screen and prevent individuals who owe federal taxes from receiving passports.  This would require transparency and more communication between the IRS and the individual States, but it seems that the opportunity to collect unpaid tax debt would be greatly improved as a result.

 

If you have an unresolved tax debt, visit us today at www.professionaltaxresolution.com for more information about our customized tax settlement assistance. The CPAs and tax professionals at Professional Tax Resolution use their extensive knowledge of the tax code to provide taxpayers with the best settlement option available. Contact us by phone at (877) 889-6527 or by email at info@protaxres.com to learn more about our services and to receive a free, no obligation consultation.