What Happens If You Can’t Pay Your Taxes?

Posted on April 26, 2016 by Kursti Nakagawa

What Happens if You Can’t Pay Your Taxes?

What happens if you owe tax money to the IRS and you cannot afford to pay it? Most importantly, do not ignore the IRS. They have a lot of information on you and are not going to forget about the money that is owed. To prevent the IRS from initiating aggressive collection techniques such as freezing your bank accounts and garnishing your wages, it best to contact them promptly. A tax problem will not go away. On the contrary, it will only compound and increase over time until it is resolved. There are several options available for resolving a tax debt. Some of these options can be initiated directly with the IRS. However, if your tax problem is complicated, it may be in your best interest to hire a qualified tax resolution specialist to assist you. Here are some steps to take if you owe back taxes and do not have the necessary funds to pay the balance in full:

File Your Taxes on Time (even if you don’t have the funds to pay the balance due): No matter what your financial situation, stick with the same process each tax year and submit your tax return by the filing deadline. Whether you decide to use the services of a CPA/accounting firm or a seasonal tax company or file on-line yourself via tax prep software, always send in your return on time or file for a tax extension. If you fail to do this, you will be assessed a failure to file penalty which will begin to accrue the day after tax day. This penalty will be levied in addition to interest and possible failure to pay penalties on any taxes you may owe. These penalties and interest charges will add up very quickly over time so it is always advisable to avoid the late filing penalty even if your do not have sufficient funds to pay the tax balances owed. Okay, this is good information, but what if you already owe the IRS money?

Set up a Payment Plan: If you owe back taxes, it is best contact the IRS immediately.The IRS would rather work with people who acknowledge owing back taxes rather than chasing around after them around to collect the outstanding tax liabilities. There are several types of installment plans that can be set up to pay off a tax bill over time. To review theses plans as well as other options available for settling a back tax balance, see the following IRS link: https://www.irs.gov/Businesses/Small-Businesses- &-Self-Employed/Filing-Past- Due-Tax- Returns . If this is your first time failing to pay your taxes on time, the IRS may be lenient and waive the penalty. See the following IRS link for information on penalty abatements: https://www.irs.gov/Businesses/Small-Businesses-&-Self- Employed/Penalty-Relief- Due-to- First-Time- Penalty-Abatement- or-Other-Administrative-Waiver.

Seek a qualified CPA or a Tax Resolution Specialist: If your tax problem is too big or too complex for you to solve on your own, a CPA or a qualified tax resolution specialist will be able help you explore your tax settlement options. Such an individual should be able to look at your situation to see which settlement options will work best for your specific set of circumstances. In addition, CPAs and Enrolled Agents have the power to negotiate directly with the IRS on your behalf in order to reach the best settlement agreement possible. Once a tax settlement plan has been set up, it is important that the payments are made according to the payment schedule and that taxes are filed on time each year. Late payments or failing to file tax returns by the filing deadlines will normally negate a previously negotiated tax settlement agreement. Simply make it a habit!

If you have tax questions or a tax debt you are unable to pay, our tax settlement professionals are happy to discuss your tax resolution options free of charge. For more information about our services, visit us today at www.professionaltaxresolution.com or call us at 877.889.6527. With over 16 years in the business of resolving tax debt, we have a thorough understanding of tax law together with the experience to know which settlement option will be the best fit for your specific set of circumstances.

Tax Debt May Result in Loss of Passport

Posted on February 29, 2016 by Kursti Nakagawa

Tax Debt May Result in Loss of Passport

One of the numerous bills passed by Congress toward the end of last year was the Fast Act (Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act). Executed on December 5, 2015, the main focal points of the bill are improving the county’s transportation infrastructure, strengthening public transportation and improving highway safety. However, in addition to the Fast Act’s focus on these transportation related issues, it contains an important line item which allows the State Department to go after United States citizens who owe back taxes by interrupting their use of a passport. The bill allows the government to refuse to issue a passport, fail to renew a passport or revoke a current passport if a taxpayer owes back taxes in excess of a certain threshold amount. This provision is particularly significant because, for the first time, it allows the IRS to share information with the State Department.

The IRS has been aggressively trying to collect back taxes for the past several years. However, they have recently had to scale back on the number of employees devoted to tax collection in order to deal with such pressing issues such as tax fraud, identity theft and tax scams. In light of this employee shortage, the Fast Act takes a step in the direction of collecting back taxes by interfacing with the State Department. It declares that any United States taxpayer who owes $50,000 or more in taxes, interest and penalties is considered to be in “seriously delinquent debt.” Once this designation has been established, the bill allows the IRS to turn to the Secretary of State to deny a passport when one is about to be issued or renewed by such an individual. Because a passport is a strong representation of freedom for any U.S. citizen, the new bill makes a powerful statement about the government’s focus on collecting delinquent tax payments.

If you are a taxpayer who falls into delinquent taxpayer category described above, it may well be advisable for you to contact a competent tax settlement professional to investigate your tax settlement options. Among other alternatives, these options include an IRS Offer in Compromise or IRS Installment Agreement. While a traditional Installment Agreement simply makes payment of a tax debt more manageable by setting up a payment plan, both the Offer and Compromise and the Partial Payment Installment Agreement settle the debt for less than the full amount owed. An additional option is to request a Collection Due Process Hearing. Once a taxpayer and the IRS have agreed upon a method for paying the back tax balance, the Secretary of State will go through the motions of removing the hold on the taxpayer’s passport. Similar to the IRS revoking a lien or a levy, the Secretary of State will deem the taxpayer’s current passport valid or issue a release allowing a passport to be renewed or a new one to be issued.

Tax Fraud Back in the Limelight

Posted on February 15, 2016 by Kursti Nakagawa

Tax Fraud Back in the Limelight

The subject of tax fraud often makes the news headlines somewhere around the opening of tax season and it appears that Tax Season 2106 is no exception. Numerous state tax agencies, including Illinois, Hawaii, Utah and, most recently, South Carolina, have already announced tax refund delays due the threat of identity theft and tax refund fraud. Although the Internal Revenue Service has not issued any similar notices of delay, they have nonetheless issued bulletins warning taxpayers of potential fraudulent activity and suggesting precautions to take to combat it.

The refund delays announced by certain states are the result of increased security measures that have been put in place to prevent identity theft and other types of tax fraud. A spokesperson for the Illinois Department of Revenue, which has announced that they are unlikely to issue any tax refunds before the middle of March, has said that efforts used last year “illustrate the positive impact that additional delays and scrutiny have had in combating tax return and identity theft.” Other states have followed suit. The Hawaii Department of Taxation announced that refunds may be delayed by as much as 16 weeks while the Utah legislature actually passed a law prohibiting the issuing of tax refunds before March 1st unless all returns and required forms were submitted by January 31st. Veranda Smith of the Federation of Tax Administrators has said that the general trend for tax agencies will be to move in the direction longer lead times in order to allow more time for the matching of information sent from multiple sources.

In addition to the delays announced by certain states, the Internal Revenue Service continues to take steps to combat tax fraud. They have published security tips on their website and have met jointly with representatives of software companies and state tax agencies for the purpose of sharing data and standardizing online security protocol. On top of this, the software companies are taking their own steps to protect taxpayers from fraudulent activity. Some have published stepped up requirements for passwords while others, such as Turbo Tax, are requiring the use of a security code sent to the cellphone in order to log on to the tax software. While the 2105 Turbo Tax software required the use of this code for the initial use of theprogram, the 2016 version has increased this security measure by giving users the option of using the code each time they log in. All of these steps are part of a clear tend on the part of the IRS, state tax agencies and software companies to increase tax return security.

Jeopardy Assessments Allow IRS to Freeze Assets

Posted on September 29, 2015 by Kursti Nakagawa

Jeopardy Assessments Allow IRS to Freeze Assets

The recent tax troubles of Barcelona soccer star Neymar da Silva Santos serve to point out the very powerful nature of tax collection agencies. Earlier this month, a Brazilian judge froze almost $50 million in assets to prevent to Neymar from hiding funds that might be needed to cover a tax debt with the Brazilian government. The total amount of the freeze was apparently equal to 150% of the soccer star’s estimated tax debt and included, not only his personal assets, but also those of family members. Although this particular jeopardy assessment was initiated by the Brazilian counterpart of the IRS, we are reminded that our own tax collection agency is equally as powerful. When collection of an outstanding tax liability is in question, the IRS has the authority to freeze whatever assets are necessary in order to cover the debt, even without following normal assessment and collection procedures.

The IRS is given the authority to initiate a jeopardy assessment such as the one recently imposed by the Brazilian government if they determine that following normal collection procedures will place collection of the tax debt in jeopardy. In such a case, the IRS is allowed to immediately levy assets to cover payment of the tax liability without waiting the normal 30-day grace period after a Notice of Intent to Levy is issued. Once an assessment such as this is handed down, the back tax balance, together with any penalties and interest that have accumulated, become immediately due and payable. In the case of income taxes, such jeopardy assessments can even include termination of the current tax year or imposing an immediate deadline on collection of taxes from the previous year.

As would be expected, the issue of jeopardy assessments violating a taxpayer’s right to due process has been challenged in court numerous times. Although the courts normally back the IRS, a 2010 Supreme Court Ruling in the case of Unites States v. Clarke upheld the taxpayer’s right to challenge the authority of the IRS. In this case, Michael Clarke disputed an IRS summons for information, saying that it had been issued as a result of his refusal to cooperate with an IRS audit. The courts agreed that he had a right to question the agent since he had been able to show some evidence of an improper motive. While the ruling did not open the floodgates for the questioning of any IRS summons, neither did it provide the IRS with the blanket protection it had hoped for. In another case, Joe Francis, creator of the pornographic entertainment company, Girls Gone Wild, said that the IRS had violated his taxpayer rights when they issued a jeopardy assessment freezing assets in his Morgan Stanley and UBS accounts. In this case, the courts upheld the actions of the IRS, saying that they were well within their rights in using extreme measures to secure payment of the $23 million back tax balance owed by Francis at that time.

If you have tax questions or a tax debt you are unable to pay, our tax settlement professionals are happy to discuss your tax resolution options free of charge. For more information about our services, visit us today at www.professionaltaxresolution.com or call us at 877.889.6527. With over 16 years in the business of resolving tax debt https://professionaltaxresolution.com/services/back-taxes-delinquent-returns/, we have a thorough understanding of tax law together with the experience to know which settlement option will be the best fit for your specific set of circumstances.

The Tax Extension Option

Posted on April 12, 2015 by Kursti Nakagawa

The Tax Extension Option

Tax Extension is a Very Good Option!

You are not alone if you do not file your tax return on or before April 15th. Although this is the official deadline for the filing of personal tax returns, each year more and more people apply for an automatic six-month tax extension. The number of taxpayers requesting an extension increased from 11 million in 2011 to over 13 million in 2013, an increase of almost 20% over the two-year period! Another interesting fact is that, in tax year 2014, 25% of those individuals who had requested and extension were still working on their tax returns in September, just one month before the October 15^th extension deadline.

Although procrastination is one reason for requesting a tax extension, there are other factors that contribute to tax returns not getting filed by the April 15^th filing deadline. Several of those are highlighted below:

Lacking Necessary Tax Information
Although the deadline for the mailing of brokerage statements is February 15^th, the information these statements contain may not be correct. These initial statements often say that changes may be coming. The mailing of corrected 1099s can actually occur right up until April 15^th which does not give the taxpayer enough time to complete the tax return before the filing deadline.

Missing Required Tax Forms
If a taxpayer holds investments that are structured as partnerships, they must wait for the K-1 Forms that are based on partnership income. These partnerships must first finish their own tax returns which can be extended until September 15^th before these forms are generated. This means that partnership K-1 Forms could be in the hands of taxpayers as late as the month preceding the extension deadline.

Increased Complexity of Tax Code
The increased complexity of the tax code has made tax returns more and more difficult to complete which, in turn, has made it harder to get them submitted by the April 15^th tax filing deadline. In addition to the introduction of such changes as the net investment income tax, two different dividend tax rates and the alternative minimum tax, taxpayers must now report all overseas holdings. All of these changes require increased tax preparation time for certain categories of taxpayers which, in turn, has resulted in an increase in the number of requests for tax extensions.

Although filing a request for a tax extension does not relieve a taxpayer of the obligation to pay any taxes owed, it is definitely a better option than filing an incorrect or incomplete return. As long as the request for a tax extension is either e-filed or postmarked before the end of the day on April 15^th, it will allow the requesting taxpayer to avoid the late filing penalty which usually amounts to 5% of any unpaid tax balance for any month or partial month that the return is late. In addition, it will give the requesting individual six full months to submit a complete and correct tax return.