Tax Penalties to Increase in 2017

Posted on September 20, 2016 by Kursti Nakagawa

Tax Penalties Set to Increase in 2017

According to the annual Bloomberg BNA report of projected tax rates, tax penalties are set to increase in 2017. The projected tax penalty increases will be applied pretty much across the board. They include penalties such as the Failure to File Penalty and the Failure to Pay Penalty imposed on individual and business taxpayers as well as significant increases in penalty assessments for tax preparers. Although the adjustments represent the expected annual increases due to inflation, they are also a result of the heightened focus by the IRS on collecting back taxes as well as tightening up the regulations governing tax preparation.

The Failure to File Penalty is one of those sharply affected by the 2017 tax penalty increases. Over the last few years this particular penalty has increased from a maximum of 25% of the tax amount owed to a maximum of 100% for 2017! Previously, a taxpayer who did not file a tax return was assessed a penalty amount of five percent of the tax amount owed for each month that the return was delinquent up to a maximum of 25% of the back tax balance. For 2017, any taxpayer who has not filed a tax return within 60 days of the filing deadline will be assessed a Failure to File Penalty of not less than $210 or 100% of the tax balance owed. The Failure to Pay Penalty is expected to hold at 0.5 % of the unpaid tax balance to be assessed each month beginning from the original due date of the return until the tax balance is paid the in full or is resolved through the negotiation of a tax settlement agreement. Likewise, the 2016 back tax balance of $50,000 used to define a “seriously delinquent” taxpayer is expected remain unchanged for 2017.

Another area which will see tax penalty increases in 2017 is that of penalties levied against tax preparers. These include penalties for various errors and omissions including Failure to Sign Return, Failure to Provide Taxpayer Identification Number, Failure to Provide Copy of Return to Taxpayer, Failure to File Correct Information Returns and Failure to Be Diligent in Determining the Child Tax Credit, the Earned Income Tax Credit and the American Opportunity Tax Credit. The maximum penalty for each of these errors will increase to $25,500 for 2017, up from a maximum of $25,000 in 2016. This represents an increase of 2%. Partnerships and S-Corporations will also see tax penalty increases in 2017. As of the first of next year, each partner or shareholder will be fined $200 for failure to file a corporate tax return or failure to file the correct information returns.

If you have tax questions or a tax debt you are unable to pay, our tax settlement professionals are happy to discuss your tax resolution options free of charge. For more information about our services, visit us today at www.professionaltaxresolution.com or call us at 877.889.6527. With over 16 years in the business of resolving tax debt, we have a thorough understanding of tax law together with the experience to know which settlement option will be the best fit for your specific set of circumstances.

Tax Debt May Result in Loss of Passport

Posted on February 29, 2016 by Kursti Nakagawa

Tax Debt May Result in Loss of Passport

One of the numerous bills passed by Congress toward the end of last year was the Fast Act (Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act). Executed on December 5, 2015, the main focal points of the bill are improving the county’s transportation infrastructure, strengthening public transportation and improving highway safety. However, in addition to the Fast Act’s focus on these transportation related issues, it contains an important line item which allows the State Department to go after United States citizens who owe back taxes by interrupting their use of a passport. The bill allows the government to refuse to issue a passport, fail to renew a passport or revoke a current passport if a taxpayer owes back taxes in excess of a certain threshold amount. This provision is particularly significant because, for the first time, it allows the IRS to share information with the State Department.

The IRS has been aggressively trying to collect back taxes for the past several years. However, they have recently had to scale back on the number of employees devoted to tax collection in order to deal with such pressing issues such as tax fraud, identity theft and tax scams. In light of this employee shortage, the Fast Act takes a step in the direction of collecting back taxes by interfacing with the State Department. It declares that any United States taxpayer who owes $50,000 or more in taxes, interest and penalties is considered to be in “seriously delinquent debt.” Once this designation has been established, the bill allows the IRS to turn to the Secretary of State to deny a passport when one is about to be issued or renewed by such an individual. Because a passport is a strong representation of freedom for any U.S. citizen, the new bill makes a powerful statement about the government’s focus on collecting delinquent tax payments.

If you are a taxpayer who falls into delinquent taxpayer category described above, it may well be advisable for you to contact a competent tax settlement professional to investigate your tax settlement options. Among other alternatives, these options include an IRS Offer in Compromise or IRS Installment Agreement. While a traditional Installment Agreement simply makes payment of a tax debt more manageable by setting up a payment plan, both the Offer and Compromise and the Partial Payment Installment Agreement settle the debt for less than the full amount owed. An additional option is to request a Collection Due Process Hearing. Once a taxpayer and the IRS have agreed upon a method for paying the back tax balance, the Secretary of State will go through the motions of removing the hold on the taxpayer’s passport. Similar to the IRS revoking a lien or a levy, the Secretary of State will deem the taxpayer’s current passport valid or issue a release allowing a passport to be renewed or a new one to be issued.

Franchise Tax Board Assessment Stopped

Posted on August 26, 2015 by Kursti Nakagawa

Franchise Tax Board Assessment Stopped

Just one month after finalizing an Offer in Compromise with the Internal Revenue Service, Mr. C contacted Professional Tax Resolution with another tax settlement issue. Having successfully settled his federal income tax debt for less than 20% of the initial amount owed, he now needed our services to help with resolving an outstanding tax liability with the State of California. Just prior to contacting our firm for the second time, he had received and official notice from the California Franchise Tax Board informing him that he owed a back tax amount of 80K for tax year 2005. This amount included both penalties and interest that had been compounding over time.

Mr. C was both confused and upset when he received the tax delinquency notice from the California Franchise Tax Board. Having just settled his federal tax debt for this same year, he was taken by surprise when he received a notice from the state informing him that he still had an outstanding tax liability with them. A member of our staff quickly reviewed the notice and realized the assessment was based on the results of IRS audit. After ruling out the possibilities of fighting the audit based on proof of expenses or of submitting an Offer in Compromise proposal with the state, our staff decided to match the state’s assessment to the Internal Revenue Service transcripts. It was this match that provided the solution to Mr. C’s back tax issue with the California Franchise Tax Board.

We quickly came to realize the Franchise Tax Board was over-assessing Mr. C. Not only was their assessment based on a higher income then the IRS transcripts reported, but it incorrectly included taxes on income that was produced outside the state. In response, our professionals quickly prepared a letter of protest informing the Franchise Tax Board of the amount of income that was not produced in California and recalculating the tax amount based on the IRS transcripts. After one month and a close review of our protest, the Franchise Tax Board recalculated their assessment based on the correct income amount and came to the conclusion that our client did not owe any additional tax. The end result was that the case was settled and closed with the most favorable outcome possible. Not only did M. C walk away without paying one dime in back taxes, but the Franchise Tax Board actually owed him money!

Can the IRS Keep Your Refund?

Posted on April 14, 2015 by Kursti Nakagawa

Who Won’t Get a Tax Refund?

It is tax refund time and most taxpayers already have a plan for their tax refund. They will save it, invest it, spend it or maybe do a little of each. However, some taxpayers will file their tax return and never receive a refund. This is due to the fact that the IRS can keep a taxpayer’s refund to cover certain types of debt, some of which are discussed below.

A Back Tax Balance with the IRS: If a taxpayer has a back tax balance with the IRS (even if they are currently enrolled in a payment plan), the agency will keep either all or part of that individual’s tax refund and credit it toward payment of their back tax balance. Although the delinquent taxpayer’s refund is either reduced or eliminated altogether for that tax year, they can at least take comfort in the fact that the IRS is helping them pay their back tax bill. It is important to keep in mind that federal income taxes and state income taxes are connected. Therefore, if an individual has a past due tax bill with the state they live in (or have lived in), they can expect that the IRS will take some or all of their refund to cover any back tax amount owed to the state.

Delinquent Child Support: If an individual is behind on court ordered child support payments, that person’s state of residence is authorized to take any one of a variety of actions. The state can garnish their wages, seize their property or keep a portion or all of their tax refund. These actions are all designed to retrieve the money that is owed in back child support.

Outstanding Student Loan Payments: If an individual falls behind on student loan payments, the federal government can take some or all of their refund to repay a portion of their student loan. This action will normally occur only if a person’s student loan account is more than ninety (90) days past due. As with back tax balances with the IRS and overdue child support, any amount of a tax refund that is withheld will be applied to the existing student loan debt.

Overdue Obamacare Payments: This is obviously a new reason as to why tax refunds can be held by the government. The Affordable Care Act has associated with it two instances where the government can withhold a person’s tax refund. The first instance occurs when an individual has not purchased health insurance coverage for the current year. In this case, the government uses the taxpayer’s refund as payment for their required health insurance coverage. The second instance where a tax refund can be withheld occurs when a subsidy has been received to offset the cost of a health insurance policy. The subsidy is considered to be a tax credit and, just like any other tax credit, it is expected to be repaid. If a taxpayer has received such a tax credit and has not repaid it, the government has several options. They can put a lien on the taxpayer’s property, garnish their wages or keep some or all of their tax refund.

The Tax Extension Option

Posted on April 12, 2015 by Kursti Nakagawa

The Tax Extension Option

Tax Extension is a Very Good Option!

You are not alone if you do not file your tax return on or before April 15th. Although this is the official deadline for the filing of personal tax returns, each year more and more people apply for an automatic six-month tax extension. The number of taxpayers requesting an extension increased from 11 million in 2011 to over 13 million in 2013, an increase of almost 20% over the two-year period! Another interesting fact is that, in tax year 2014, 25% of those individuals who had requested and extension were still working on their tax returns in September, just one month before the October 15^th extension deadline.

Although procrastination is one reason for requesting a tax extension, there are other factors that contribute to tax returns not getting filed by the April 15^th filing deadline. Several of those are highlighted below:

Lacking Necessary Tax Information
Although the deadline for the mailing of brokerage statements is February 15^th, the information these statements contain may not be correct. These initial statements often say that changes may be coming. The mailing of corrected 1099s can actually occur right up until April 15^th which does not give the taxpayer enough time to complete the tax return before the filing deadline.

Missing Required Tax Forms
If a taxpayer holds investments that are structured as partnerships, they must wait for the K-1 Forms that are based on partnership income. These partnerships must first finish their own tax returns which can be extended until September 15^th before these forms are generated. This means that partnership K-1 Forms could be in the hands of taxpayers as late as the month preceding the extension deadline.

Increased Complexity of Tax Code
The increased complexity of the tax code has made tax returns more and more difficult to complete which, in turn, has made it harder to get them submitted by the April 15^th tax filing deadline. In addition to the introduction of such changes as the net investment income tax, two different dividend tax rates and the alternative minimum tax, taxpayers must now report all overseas holdings. All of these changes require increased tax preparation time for certain categories of taxpayers which, in turn, has resulted in an increase in the number of requests for tax extensions.

Although filing a request for a tax extension does not relieve a taxpayer of the obligation to pay any taxes owed, it is definitely a better option than filing an incorrect or incomplete return. As long as the request for a tax extension is either e-filed or postmarked before the end of the day on April 15^th, it will allow the requesting taxpayer to avoid the late filing penalty which usually amounts to 5% of any unpaid tax balance for any month or partial month that the return is late. In addition, it will give the requesting individual six full months to submit a complete and correct tax return.