Some Critical Year-End Tax Considerations

Posted on December 9, 2015 by Kursti Nakagawa

Year-End Tax Considerations

Very few important tax decisions have been passed down in 2015 and, with only a few weeks to go, it appears that we may move into the New Year with some important tax matters still unresolved. Some of the critical tax issues hanging in the balance as we move into 2016 are the tax extenders legislation, internet taxation and the licensing of tax preparers. All of these topics are in one stage or another of being discussed and considered by Congress but have not made it through the legislative system to be signed into law. With less than a month to go, it will be interesting to see if any of these measures are enacted before the end of the year.

One important tax measure that is on the hot seat this month is a renewal of the provisions of the bill officially titled the Tax Increase Prevention Act of 2014 (HR 5771). This bill, which included some very important bill tax breaks, officially expired on December 31, 2014. Although the Senate Finance Committee had said they would begin work on a new piece of legislation that would extend many of these provisions, they have yet to present their revisions. This means that, unless Congress acts quickly to extend these tax breaks and make them retroactive to January 1, 2015, they will not be available to individuals and businesses for the 2015 tax year. If this legislation is not extended, business will no longer have access to its 50% bonus depreciation provision or the increased expensing and investment ceiling limits of $500,000 and $2.5 million, respectively. Likewise, individual taxpayers will not be able to write off mortgage debt, deduct the premiums paid for private mortgage insurance or have the ability to use an itemized deduction for state and local sales taxes.

Another important tax issue in focus this month is the Internet Tax Freedom Act which is set to expire on December 11th. The taxing of internet access has been banned since 1997 but the law which prevents it is not a permanent one. This law, which has already been extended several times since its inception, is now set to expire this month. Although the House recently approved the Permanent Internet Tax freedom Act and the Senate followed with its version called the Internet Tax Freedom Forever Act, no further action has been taken to get this legislation signed into law.

In addition to the two tax issues outlined above, Congress is considering legislation that would require the licensing of tax preparers. After attempts by the Internal Revenue Service to require licensing failed in the court system, the Senate Finance committee agreed that they would act on the issue. Following this, member of the House of Representatives introduced a bill called the Tax Return Competency Act. However, the proposal, which is designed to help prevent tax fraud by screening individuals who provide tax preparation services, still sitting in committee. Although the IRS was hoping to have some type of legislation in place before the start of the 2016 tax season, only the time will tell whether this wish will become a reality.

If you have tax questions or a tax debt you are unable to pay, our tax settlement professionals are happy to discuss your tax resolution options free of charge. For more information about our services, visit us today at www.professionaltaxresolution.com or call us at 877.889.6527. With over 16 years in the business of resolving tax debt, we have a thorough understanding of tax law together with the experience to know which settlement option will be the best fit for your specific set of circumstances.

Charitable Contributions Require Documention

Posted on November 4, 2015 by Kursti Nakagawa

Charitable Contributions Require Documentation

Although charitable contributions can amount to a significant tax savings, they can also have the negative affect of flagging a return from audit when they are claimed in excess or not reported according to preset IRS guidelines. A case in point is that of Kunkel versus United States Tax Commissioner. In this 2011 United States Tax Court case, the court disallowed over $37,000 in noncash contributions due to lack of substantiation. While the Kunkels maintained that the value of each donation was less than $250, the court questioned the total amount of the contributions. They pointed out that the total donation amount could have only been achieved by making almost 100 trips to various donation sites. In addition, the Kunkels had no dated receipts from any of the receiving charities giving either a value or description of the property being donated.

In order to avoid a situation such as the one described above, it is important to follow the guidelines set by the Internal Revenue Service for reporting charitable contributions. According to these guidelines, increasingly strict documentation requirements are imposed on charitable donations above or below the following preset thresholds:

 Contributions of less than $250

Contributions of less than $250 require 1) the name and location of the charitable organization to which the donation is being made, 2) the date the donation is made and 3) a description of the property being donated. Although it is advisable to get a receipt from the organization to which the donation is being made, this is not required.

 Contributions in excess of $250

In addition to the documentation required for contributions of less than $250, those in excess of $250 must have a written receipt from the charitable organization to which the contribution is made. In addition to a description of the donated property, the receipt must include a good faith estimate of the property’s value as well as a statement indicating whether any goods or services were given in exchange for the contribution.

 Contributions in excess of $500

Charitable donations in excess of $500 require 1) a specific description of the property being donated, 2) the date the property was acquired, 3) the cost basis of the property, 4) the fair market value of the property at the time the donation is made and 5) a statement of the method used to calculate fair market value.

 Contributions in excess of $5000

In addition to all of the documentation required for donations in excess of $500, charitable contributions in excess of $5000 require a qualified appraisal.

With the end of the calendar year fast aproaching, now is as good a time as any to review the IRS guidelines for documenting charitable contributions. Although the IRS sometimes allows charitable deductions even when the reporting taxpayer lacks the required documentation, there is no good reason to take a chance on this being the case. It is better to be safe than sorry! Charitable contributions can amount to a significant savings of tax dollars but proper reporting is essential.

The Tax Extension Option

Posted on April 12, 2015 by Kursti Nakagawa

The Tax Extension Option

Tax Extension is a Very Good Option!

You are not alone if you do not file your tax return on or before April 15th. Although this is the official deadline for the filing of personal tax returns, each year more and more people apply for an automatic six-month tax extension. The number of taxpayers requesting an extension increased from 11 million in 2011 to over 13 million in 2013, an increase of almost 20% over the two-year period! Another interesting fact is that, in tax year 2014, 25% of those individuals who had requested and extension were still working on their tax returns in September, just one month before the October 15^th extension deadline.

Although procrastination is one reason for requesting a tax extension, there are other factors that contribute to tax returns not getting filed by the April 15^th filing deadline. Several of those are highlighted below:

Lacking Necessary Tax Information
Although the deadline for the mailing of brokerage statements is February 15^th, the information these statements contain may not be correct. These initial statements often say that changes may be coming. The mailing of corrected 1099s can actually occur right up until April 15^th which does not give the taxpayer enough time to complete the tax return before the filing deadline.

Missing Required Tax Forms
If a taxpayer holds investments that are structured as partnerships, they must wait for the K-1 Forms that are based on partnership income. These partnerships must first finish their own tax returns which can be extended until September 15^th before these forms are generated. This means that partnership K-1 Forms could be in the hands of taxpayers as late as the month preceding the extension deadline.

Increased Complexity of Tax Code
The increased complexity of the tax code has made tax returns more and more difficult to complete which, in turn, has made it harder to get them submitted by the April 15^th tax filing deadline. In addition to the introduction of such changes as the net investment income tax, two different dividend tax rates and the alternative minimum tax, taxpayers must now report all overseas holdings. All of these changes require increased tax preparation time for certain categories of taxpayers which, in turn, has resulted in an increase in the number of requests for tax extensions.

Although filing a request for a tax extension does not relieve a taxpayer of the obligation to pay any taxes owed, it is definitely a better option than filing an incorrect or incomplete return. As long as the request for a tax extension is either e-filed or postmarked before the end of the day on April 15^th, it will allow the requesting taxpayer to avoid the late filing penalty which usually amounts to 5% of any unpaid tax balance for any month or partial month that the return is late. In addition, it will give the requesting individual six full months to submit a complete and correct tax return.

Why You Should File Your Taxes

Posted on March 16, 2015 by Kursti Nakagawa

Why You Should File Your Taxes by April 15

Taxes Due April 15

April 15th is an important filing deadline for individual taxpayers. If the Internal Revenue Service does not receive either a completed tax return or an application for a six-month tax extension by this date, they will automatically assess a failure-to-file penalty. In addition, they will begin to assess a failure-to-pay penalty on any tax amounts owed. Although the failure-to-file penalty can be diverted by applying for a six month tax extension, late payment and interest assessments will automatically begin to accrue as of the April 15th tax deadline regardless of whether a tax extension has been filed.

Because the penalties and interest described above are compounded over time, the financial consequences of failing to file tax returns and failing to pay tax amounts owed can be significant. The failure-to-file penalty is assessed at a rate of 5% of the back tax balance for each month or partial month that a return is not filed up to a maximum of 25% of the outstanding tax liability shown on the return. A minimum penalty of either $100 or the entire amount of the back tax balance is assessed for any return that is not filed within 60 days of the filing deadline. In addition, a failure-to-pay penalty is assessed at a rate of 0.5% per month for each month or partial month following the filing deadline where a back tax balance remains unpaid. This rate is reduced it 0.25% if a taxpayer is making payments according to the terms of an official installment agreement and is excused altogether if a tax extension was filed and 90% of the back tax balance was paid on or before the original filing deadline. The failure-to-pay penalty is assessed for a maximum or 50 months, thus capping out at maximum of 25% of the original tax liability.

The lesson to be learned from all of this is that the filing of tax returns and the paying tax bills should be taken seriously. As is pointed out above, the financial consequences of not doing so can be significant. The failure-to-file penalty can be avoided by simply filing a tax return by the filing deadline even in the case where funds are not available to pay the tax amounts due. Outside of this, a taxpayer should avoid the compounding of penalties and interest by being proactive in coming up with a plan to pay any outstanding tax liability. To this end, the IRS is willing to work with delinquent taxpayers to come up with payment plans they can afford. Once a payment amount is determined based on the size of the back tax balance and the taxpayer’s financial situation, the taxpayer simply pays this monthly installment amount until the back tax balance is paid off. This is a far better solution than ignoring a tax bill and then having to pay the back taxes plus an additional 25% of the original tax amount owed.

Choose Your Tax Preparer Wisely

Posted on February 23, 2015 by Kursti Nakagawa

How To Choose a Tax Preparer

Choose Your Tax Preparer Wisely

Choose Your Tax Preparer Wisely: With over half of all taxpayers enlisting the services of a tax preparer, tax preparation has become a major industry. This being the case, the selection of a reputable tax preparer is a task at hand for many at this time of year. Although the services of a tax preparer can be an invaluable asset in saving tax dollars as well as meeting tax deadlines and compliance requirements, choosing one that is both competent and ethical and is often a difficult process.

When choosing a tax preparer, it is important to select a firm or an individual that has an established licensing history and a verifiable physical address. The absence of either of these could mean that the firm may not be around to answer questions and follow up if there are problems once the return has been filed. In terms of licensing it is important to use a preparer with a Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN). Since Certified Public Accountants and Enrolled Agents are the only preparers who can represent their clients before the IRS in all tax matters, it may be advisable to seek a preparer with one of these additional certifications if the return is difficult or presents unusual problems. It is also prudent to check out available reviews and ratings of any tax preparer under consideration in addition to making sure there are no registered complaints against that firm or individual.

In light of the points discussed in the previous paragraph, the following is a list of some things to avoid when selecting a tax preparer:

 Avoid any tax preparer who does not have a valid 2015 PTIN. Preparer Tax Identification Numbers are renewable each year so any reputable tax preparer should have a current PTIN number.

 Avoid tax preparers who want you to sign a blank return or do not sign the return themselves.

 Avoid tax preparers who ask you to mail in a paper return rather than filing your return electronically. Most preparers are required to file electronically so a request that you do otherwise should be a red flag.

 Avoid a tax preparer who suggests that you deposit a tax refund in to any account other than your own. This practice is not allowed by the Internal Revenue Service.

 Avoid tax preparers who base their fees on a percentage of the refund amount rather than on the type and complexity of the return.

 Avoid tax preparers who make promises that have no basis in reality such as guaranteeing a high refund without examining tax documents or promising a refund by a certain date.

In summary, the process of selecting a tax preparer should focus on choosing an established individual or tax preparation firm with good reviews and ratings and a verifiable licensing history. It should avoid those who do not meet these qualifications and make extravagant promises that they are unlikely to keep. While a competent tax preparer can be a great asset, choosing the wrong one can be worse than not having one at all!