Tax Debt May Result in Loss of Passport

Posted on February 29, 2016 by Kursti Nakagawa

One of the numerous bills passed by Congress toward the end of last year was the Fast Act (Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act). Executed on December 5, 2015, the main focal points of the bill are improving the county’s transportation infrastructure, strengthening public transportation and improving highway safety. However, in addition to the Fast Act’s focus on these transportation related issues, it contains an important line item which allows the State Department to go after United States citizens who owe back taxes by interrupting their use of a passport. The bill allows the government to refuse to issue a passport, fail to renew a passport or revoke a current passport if a taxpayer owes back taxes in excess of a certain threshold amount. This provision is particularly significant because, for the first time, it allows the IRS to share information with the State Department.

The IRS has been aggressively trying to collect back taxes for the past several years. However, they have recently had to scale back on the number of employees devoted to tax collection in order to deal with such pressing issues such as tax fraud, identity theft and tax scams. In light of this employee shortage, the Fast Act takes a step in the direction of collecting back taxes by interfacing with the State Department. It declares that any United States taxpayer who owes $50,000 or more in taxes, interest and penalties is considered to be in “seriously delinquent debt.” Once this designation has been established, the bill allows the IRS to turn to the Secretary of State to deny a passport when one is about to be issued or renewed by such an individual. Because a passport is a strong representation of freedom for any U.S. citizen, the new bill makes a powerful statement about the government’s focus on collecting delinquent tax payments.

If you are a taxpayer who falls into delinquent taxpayer category described above, it may well be advisable for you to contact a competent tax settlement professional to investigate your tax settlement options. Among other alternatives, these options include an IRS Offer in Compromise or IRS Installment Agreement. While a traditional Installment Agreement simply makes payment of a tax debt more manageable by setting up a payment plan, both the Offer and Compromise and the Partial Payment Installment Agreement settle the debt for less than the full amount owed. An additional option is to request a Collection Due Process Hearing. Once a taxpayer and the IRS have agreed upon a method for paying the back tax balance, the Secretary of State will go through the motions of removing the hold on the taxpayer’s passport. Similar to the IRS revoking a lien or a levy, the Secretary of State will deem the taxpayer’s current passport valid or issue a release allowing a passport to be renewed or a new one to be issued.

If you have tax questions or a tax debt you are unable to pay, our tax settlement professionals are happy to discuss your tax resolution options free of charge. For more information about our services, visit us today at www.professionaltaxresolution.com or call us at 877.889.6527. With over 16 years in the business of resolving tax debt, we have a thorough understanding of tax law together with the experience to know which settlement option will be the best fit for your specific set of circumstances.

Jeopardy Assessments Allow IRS to Freeze Assets

Posted on September 29, 2015 by Kursti Nakagawa

Jeopardy Assessments Allow IRS to Freeze Assets

The recent tax troubles of Barcelona soccer star Neymar da Silva Santos serve to point out the very powerful nature of tax collection agencies. Earlier this month, a Brazilian judge froze almost $50 million in assets to prevent to Neymar from hiding funds that might be needed to cover a tax debt with the Brazilian government. The total amount of the freeze was apparently equal to 150% of the soccer star’s estimated tax debt and included, not only his personal assets, but also those of family members. Although this particular jeopardy assessment was initiated by the Brazilian counterpart of the IRS, we are reminded that our own tax collection agency is equally as powerful. When collection of an outstanding tax liability is in question, the IRS has the authority to freeze whatever assets are necessary in order to cover the debt, even without following normal assessment and collection procedures.

The IRS is given the authority to initiate a jeopardy assessment such as the one recently imposed by the Brazilian government if they determine that following normal collection procedures will place collection of the tax debt in jeopardy. In such a case, the IRS is allowed to immediately levy assets to cover payment of the tax liability without waiting the normal 30-day grace period after a Notice of Intent to Levy is issued. Once an assessment such as this is handed down, the back tax balance, together with any penalties and interest that have accumulated, become immediately due and payable. In the case of income taxes, such jeopardy assessments can even include termination of the current tax year or imposing an immediate deadline on collection of taxes from the previous year.

As would be expected, the issue of jeopardy assessments violating a taxpayer’s right to due process has been challenged in court numerous times. Although the courts normally back the IRS, a 2010 Supreme Court Ruling in the case of Unites States v. Clarke upheld the taxpayer’s right to challenge the authority of the IRS. In this case, Michael Clarke disputed an IRS summons for information, saying that it had been issued as a result of his refusal to cooperate with an IRS audit. The courts agreed that he had a right to question the agent since he had been able to show some evidence of an improper motive. While the ruling did not open the floodgates for the questioning of any IRS summons, neither did it provide the IRS with the blanket protection it had hoped for. In another case, Joe Francis, creator of the pornographic entertainment company, Girls Gone Wild, said that the IRS had violated his taxpayer rights when they issued a jeopardy assessment freezing assets in his Morgan Stanley and UBS accounts. In this case, the courts upheld the actions of the IRS, saying that they were well within their rights in using extreme measures to secure payment of the $23 million back tax balance owed by Francis at that time.

If you have tax questions or a tax debt you are unable to pay, our tax settlement professionals are happy to discuss your tax resolution options free of charge. For more information about our services, visit us today at www.professionaltaxresolution.com or call us at 877.889.6527. With over 16 years in the business of resolving tax debt https://professionaltaxresolution.com/services/back-taxes-delinquent-returns/, we have a thorough understanding of tax law together with the experience to know which settlement option will be the best fit for your specific set of circumstances.

Pros & Cons of Outsourcing the Collection of Tax Debt

Posted on August 24, 2015 by Kursti Nakagawa

Pros and Cons of Outsourcing the Collection of Tax Debt

Pros & Cons of the Outsourcing of Collection of Tax Debt

Pros & Cons of Outsourcing the Collection of Tax Debt

The Senate Finance Committee has recently revived their discussion of outsourcing the collection of back taxes. According to certain estimates, turning the collection of delinquent taxes over to private collection agencies would save the government more than two billion dollars over a period of ten years. However, opponents of privatization maintain that this would not be the case. In addition to emphasizing the potential threat to taxpayer security, they point to attempts at outsourcing the collection process that have not worked particularly well in the past. Time will tell whether the Treasury Secretary, who currently has the authority to make such a switch, will give it another try.

Those who favor privatizing the collection of tax debt say that it will raise more revenue that it costs. While this did not happen in a previous attempt at outsourcing that was made between 2006 and 2009, proponents say that the powers that be have learned from their past mistakes.They say that turning IRS collections over to private collection agencies will generate extra revenue that The IRS can use to hire new employees. In addition, they point to the fact that removing the task of debt collection from the IRS will allow the understaffed agency to focus its human resources on other important tax matters that have suffered in recent years.

On the other side of the fence, opponents of outsourcing say privatizing the collection of tax debt will not work. The National Treasury Employees Union points to data from the previous attempt at outsourcing which shows that the IRS collected over 60% more in the first two years of the program than the private collection agencies did – $139 million compared to $56 million. Although the private companies did better at collecting from cases where the amount owed was not in dispute, they lacked the authority to collect in the more difficult cases. The Center for Effective Government maintains that private companies will never be as effective as the IRS at collecting back taxes. According their spokesperson. “Collecting back taxes is an inherently governmental function, something that the government is uniquely positioned to do.” The IRS is the only collection agency that can garnish wages, levy bank accounts, Social Security benefits and 401k plans, place tax liens on property and even seize assets, all without judicial approval! These powers indeed make it the most powerful collection agency in the county, a fact that opponents of outsourcing tax debt collection are quick to point out.

Can the IRS Keep Your Refund?

Posted on April 14, 2015 by Kursti Nakagawa

Who Won’t Get a Tax Refund?

It is tax refund time and most taxpayers already have a plan for their tax refund. They will save it, invest it, spend it or maybe do a little of each. However, some taxpayers will file their tax return and never receive a refund. This is due to the fact that the IRS can keep a taxpayer’s refund to cover certain types of debt, some of which are discussed below.

A Back Tax Balance with the IRS: If a taxpayer has a back tax balance with the IRS (even if they are currently enrolled in a payment plan), the agency will keep either all or part of that individual’s tax refund and credit it toward payment of their back tax balance. Although the delinquent taxpayer’s refund is either reduced or eliminated altogether for that tax year, they can at least take comfort in the fact that the IRS is helping them pay their back tax bill. It is important to keep in mind that federal income taxes and state income taxes are connected. Therefore, if an individual has a past due tax bill with the state they live in (or have lived in), they can expect that the IRS will take some or all of their refund to cover any back tax amount owed to the state.

Delinquent Child Support: If an individual is behind on court ordered child support payments, that person’s state of residence is authorized to take any one of a variety of actions. The state can garnish their wages, seize their property or keep a portion or all of their tax refund. These actions are all designed to retrieve the money that is owed in back child support.

Outstanding Student Loan Payments: If an individual falls behind on student loan payments, the federal government can take some or all of their refund to repay a portion of their student loan. This action will normally occur only if a person’s student loan account is more than ninety (90) days past due. As with back tax balances with the IRS and overdue child support, any amount of a tax refund that is withheld will be applied to the existing student loan debt.

Overdue Obamacare Payments: This is obviously a new reason as to why tax refunds can be held by the government. The Affordable Care Act has associated with it two instances where the government can withhold a person’s tax refund. The first instance occurs when an individual has not purchased health insurance coverage for the current year. In this case, the government uses the taxpayer’s refund as payment for their required health insurance coverage. The second instance where a tax refund can be withheld occurs when a subsidy has been received to offset the cost of a health insurance policy. The subsidy is considered to be a tax credit and, just like any other tax credit, it is expected to be repaid. If a taxpayer has received such a tax credit and has not repaid it, the government has several options. They can put a lien on the taxpayer’s property, garnish their wages or keep some or all of their tax refund.

Do Not Ignore Mail from the IRS….

Posted on June 17, 2014 by Kursti Nakagawa

Ignoring Communication from the IRS Brings Serious Consequences

Why You Should Not Ignore Mail from the IRS – Although the issuance of an IRS Notice of Deficiency is usually the first step in the collection of an outstanding tax liability, ignoring it can have serious consequences. The Notice of Deficiency is an official communication from the IRS informing a taxpayer that the tax amount due shown on their tax return is less than the amount owed according to the calculations of the IRS. Because the IRS is allowed to collect a tax debt without proof that the debt exists, a taxpayer who receives an IRS Notice of Deficiency must either pay the tax liability shown on the notice or file a petition with the United States Tax Court contesting the tax amount owed. The burden of proof rests with the taxpayer.

A Notice of Deficiency is a formal written communication from the IRS. It is sent by certified or registered mail to a taxpayer’s last address of record for the purpose of announcing a tax deficiency. It must include an explanation of the deficiency together with a statement of the total amount of taxes, interest and penalties that have been assessed. In addition, the Notice of Deficiency informs the receiving taxpayer of their appeal rights with the United States Tax Court and states the cutoff date for filing an appeal. Although a IRS Notice of Deficiency is most often sent when there is a discrepancy between IRS calculations and the tax amount due shown a on a tax return, it can also be sent when no tax return has been filed.

A taxpayer must respond to a Notice of Deficiency within 90 days from the date it was mailed or within 150 days if it was mailed to an address outside of the United States. The taxpayer must either pay the assessed tax liability or to file an appeal with the United States Tax Court. Once the appeal deadline has passed, the appeal process is closed and the IRS has the authority to collect the tax amount owed. At this point, the IRS is likely to issue a Notice of Intent to Levy. The Notice of Intent to Levy allows a response time of 30 days (which is not required if the IRS determines that collection of the tax debt is in jeopardy), after which a taxpayer’s property can be seized to cover their tax debt. A taxpayer’s only option once the 90 day appeal deadline has passed is to pay the tax balance owed and apply for a refund, although even this action may not stop the collection process once it is set in motion!

Because tax law is complex and receiving an official communication from the IRS can be intimidating and sometimes confusing, it may be advisable for a taxpayer to enlist the services if a qualified tax professional before responding to a Notice of Deficiency. A CPA or Enrolled Agent will be able to determine whether the tax amount shown on the Notice of Deficiency is accurate and will be able to communicate effectively with the IRS on the taxpayer’s behalf.

If you have received an IRS Notice of Deficiency, a Notice of Intent to Levy or have been officially warned of an impending tax lien or wage garnishment, we can help you stop the immediate collection activity and work toward resolving your tax debt. Visit www.professionaltaxresolution.com to learn more about full range of tax settlement services. Contact us today at (949) 596-4143 or email us at info@protaxres.com to receive a free, no obligation consultation and get the tax relief you deserve.