Tax Penalties to Increase in 2017

Posted on September 20, 2016 by Kursti Nakagawa

Tax Penalties Set to Increase in 2017

According to the annual Bloomberg BNA report of projected tax rates, tax penalties are set to increase in 2017. The projected tax penalty increases will be applied pretty much across the board. They include penalties such as the Failure to File Penalty and the Failure to Pay Penalty imposed on individual and business taxpayers as well as significant increases in penalty assessments for tax preparers. Although the adjustments represent the expected annual increases due to inflation, they are also a result of the heightened focus by the IRS on collecting back taxes as well as tightening up the regulations governing tax preparation.

The Failure to File Penalty is one of those sharply affected by the 2017 tax penalty increases. Over the last few years this particular penalty has increased from a maximum of 25% of the tax amount owed to a maximum of 100% for 2017! Previously, a taxpayer who did not file a tax return was assessed a penalty amount of five percent of the tax amount owed for each month that the return was delinquent up to a maximum of 25% of the back tax balance. For 2017, any taxpayer who has not filed a tax return within 60 days of the filing deadline will be assessed a Failure to File Penalty of not less than $210 or 100% of the tax balance owed. The Failure to Pay Penalty is expected to hold at 0.5 % of the unpaid tax balance to be assessed each month beginning from the original due date of the return until the tax balance is paid the in full or is resolved through the negotiation of a tax settlement agreement. Likewise, the 2016 back tax balance of $50,000 used to define a “seriously delinquent” taxpayer is expected remain unchanged for 2017.

Another area which will see tax penalty increases in 2017 is that of penalties levied against tax preparers. These include penalties for various errors and omissions including Failure to Sign Return, Failure to Provide Taxpayer Identification Number, Failure to Provide Copy of Return to Taxpayer, Failure to File Correct Information Returns and Failure to Be Diligent in Determining the Child Tax Credit, the Earned Income Tax Credit and the American Opportunity Tax Credit. The maximum penalty for each of these errors will increase to $25,500 for 2017, up from a maximum of $25,000 in 2016. This represents an increase of 2%. Partnerships and S-Corporations will also see tax penalty increases in 2017. As of the first of next year, each partner or shareholder will be fined $200 for failure to file a corporate tax return or failure to file the correct information returns.

If you have tax questions or a tax debt you are unable to pay, our tax settlement professionals are happy to discuss your tax resolution options free of charge. For more information about our services, visit us today at www.professionaltaxresolution.com or call us at 877.889.6527. With over 16 years in the business of resolving tax debt, we have a thorough understanding of tax law together with the experience to know which settlement option will be the best fit for your specific set of circumstances.

Tax Debt May Result in Loss of Passport

Posted on February 29, 2016 by Kursti Nakagawa

Tax Debt May Result in Loss of Passport

One of the numerous bills passed by Congress toward the end of last year was the Fast Act (Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act). Executed on December 5, 2015, the main focal points of the bill are improving the county’s transportation infrastructure, strengthening public transportation and improving highway safety. However, in addition to the Fast Act’s focus on these transportation related issues, it contains an important line item which allows the State Department to go after United States citizens who owe back taxes by interrupting their use of a passport. The bill allows the government to refuse to issue a passport, fail to renew a passport or revoke a current passport if a taxpayer owes back taxes in excess of a certain threshold amount. This provision is particularly significant because, for the first time, it allows the IRS to share information with the State Department.

The IRS has been aggressively trying to collect back taxes for the past several years. However, they have recently had to scale back on the number of employees devoted to tax collection in order to deal with such pressing issues such as tax fraud, identity theft and tax scams. In light of this employee shortage, the Fast Act takes a step in the direction of collecting back taxes by interfacing with the State Department. It declares that any United States taxpayer who owes $50,000 or more in taxes, interest and penalties is considered to be in “seriously delinquent debt.” Once this designation has been established, the bill allows the IRS to turn to the Secretary of State to deny a passport when one is about to be issued or renewed by such an individual. Because a passport is a strong representation of freedom for any U.S. citizen, the new bill makes a powerful statement about the government’s focus on collecting delinquent tax payments.

If you are a taxpayer who falls into delinquent taxpayer category described above, it may well be advisable for you to contact a competent tax settlement professional to investigate your tax settlement options. Among other alternatives, these options include an IRS Offer in Compromise or IRS Installment Agreement. While a traditional Installment Agreement simply makes payment of a tax debt more manageable by setting up a payment plan, both the Offer and Compromise and the Partial Payment Installment Agreement settle the debt for less than the full amount owed. An additional option is to request a Collection Due Process Hearing. Once a taxpayer and the IRS have agreed upon a method for paying the back tax balance, the Secretary of State will go through the motions of removing the hold on the taxpayer’s passport. Similar to the IRS revoking a lien or a levy, the Secretary of State will deem the taxpayer’s current passport valid or issue a release allowing a passport to be renewed or a new one to be issued.

Tax Debt Reduced by Filing Past Due Returns

Posted on September 8, 2015 by Kursti Nakagawa

Tax Debt Reduced Through Filing of Past Due Tax Returns

Sometimes resolving a back tax balance is as simple as filing past due tax returns. The case of Mr. P involved just that! When he contacted our office, he had not filed either his corporate tax returns or his personal income tax returns for the last 10 or 11 years. Unsure of how to proceed and fearful of the potential consequences of his negligence, he contacted the tax settlement specialists at Professional Tax Resolutions for advice and help. Our team informed Mr. P that it would be necessary to contact the government immediately in order to collect the specific details necessary to come up with an appropriate plan of action. Among other things, we needed to know exactly which tax returns had not been filed as well as what back tax balances were showing for each year. In addition, it was imperative that we obtain a list of the official tax documents that the government had on file for each year that tax returns had not been submitted.

Anxious to put his tax problems behind him, Mr. P was eager to get started on his case. Within a few days, our tax professionals had contacted the government, received the requested information and were ready with a plan of action. Once our client had compiled the accounting records for his corporation, we compared them to those we had already received from the IRS and began to prepare the corporate income tax returns. Concurrently, we prepared M. P’s personal income tax returns for all years where one had not been filed. After all was said and done, the corporation was set up on a payment plan with the IRS and the FTB balance was lowered to the amount of the franchise fee plus accumulated penalties and interest. In addition, the client’s personal back tax balance was reduced by 80% with both the federal and state tax agencies.

As is evident from reviewing the case of Mr. P, it is important to select a tax professional who has a thorough understanding of the specific back tax issues one is facing. In particular, when a business entity is involved, it is important to choose a tax specialist who understands business accounting and entity taxation as well as the effect business income has on the individual’s personal tax balances. The tax team at Professional Tax Resolution is well equipped to resolve both personal and business tax issues. When a business is involved, they understand the interconnectedness of personal and business taxes and realize that it is important to consider both in order to come up with the best possible plan of action.

The Tax Extension Option

Posted on April 12, 2015 by Kursti Nakagawa

The Tax Extension Option

Tax Extension is a Very Good Option!

You are not alone if you do not file your tax return on or before April 15th. Although this is the official deadline for the filing of personal tax returns, each year more and more people apply for an automatic six-month tax extension. The number of taxpayers requesting an extension increased from 11 million in 2011 to over 13 million in 2013, an increase of almost 20% over the two-year period! Another interesting fact is that, in tax year 2014, 25% of those individuals who had requested and extension were still working on their tax returns in September, just one month before the October 15^th extension deadline.

Although procrastination is one reason for requesting a tax extension, there are other factors that contribute to tax returns not getting filed by the April 15^th filing deadline. Several of those are highlighted below:

Lacking Necessary Tax Information
Although the deadline for the mailing of brokerage statements is February 15^th, the information these statements contain may not be correct. These initial statements often say that changes may be coming. The mailing of corrected 1099s can actually occur right up until April 15^th which does not give the taxpayer enough time to complete the tax return before the filing deadline.

Missing Required Tax Forms
If a taxpayer holds investments that are structured as partnerships, they must wait for the K-1 Forms that are based on partnership income. These partnerships must first finish their own tax returns which can be extended until September 15^th before these forms are generated. This means that partnership K-1 Forms could be in the hands of taxpayers as late as the month preceding the extension deadline.

Increased Complexity of Tax Code
The increased complexity of the tax code has made tax returns more and more difficult to complete which, in turn, has made it harder to get them submitted by the April 15^th tax filing deadline. In addition to the introduction of such changes as the net investment income tax, two different dividend tax rates and the alternative minimum tax, taxpayers must now report all overseas holdings. All of these changes require increased tax preparation time for certain categories of taxpayers which, in turn, has resulted in an increase in the number of requests for tax extensions.

Although filing a request for a tax extension does not relieve a taxpayer of the obligation to pay any taxes owed, it is definitely a better option than filing an incorrect or incomplete return. As long as the request for a tax extension is either e-filed or postmarked before the end of the day on April 15^th, it will allow the requesting taxpayer to avoid the late filing penalty which usually amounts to 5% of any unpaid tax balance for any month or partial month that the return is late. In addition, it will give the requesting individual six full months to submit a complete and correct tax return.

Why You Should File Your Taxes

Posted on March 16, 2015 by Kursti Nakagawa

Why You Should File Your Taxes by April 15

Taxes Due April 15

April 15th is an important filing deadline for individual taxpayers. If the Internal Revenue Service does not receive either a completed tax return or an application for a six-month tax extension by this date, they will automatically assess a failure-to-file penalty. In addition, they will begin to assess a failure-to-pay penalty on any tax amounts owed. Although the failure-to-file penalty can be diverted by applying for a six month tax extension, late payment and interest assessments will automatically begin to accrue as of the April 15th tax deadline regardless of whether a tax extension has been filed.

Because the penalties and interest described above are compounded over time, the financial consequences of failing to file tax returns and failing to pay tax amounts owed can be significant. The failure-to-file penalty is assessed at a rate of 5% of the back tax balance for each month or partial month that a return is not filed up to a maximum of 25% of the outstanding tax liability shown on the return. A minimum penalty of either $100 or the entire amount of the back tax balance is assessed for any return that is not filed within 60 days of the filing deadline. In addition, a failure-to-pay penalty is assessed at a rate of 0.5% per month for each month or partial month following the filing deadline where a back tax balance remains unpaid. This rate is reduced it 0.25% if a taxpayer is making payments according to the terms of an official installment agreement and is excused altogether if a tax extension was filed and 90% of the back tax balance was paid on or before the original filing deadline. The failure-to-pay penalty is assessed for a maximum or 50 months, thus capping out at maximum of 25% of the original tax liability.

The lesson to be learned from all of this is that the filing of tax returns and the paying tax bills should be taken seriously. As is pointed out above, the financial consequences of not doing so can be significant. The failure-to-file penalty can be avoided by simply filing a tax return by the filing deadline even in the case where funds are not available to pay the tax amounts due. Outside of this, a taxpayer should avoid the compounding of penalties and interest by being proactive in coming up with a plan to pay any outstanding tax liability. To this end, the IRS is willing to work with delinquent taxpayers to come up with payment plans they can afford. Once a payment amount is determined based on the size of the back tax balance and the taxpayer’s financial situation, the taxpayer simply pays this monthly installment amount until the back tax balance is paid off. This is a far better solution than ignoring a tax bill and then having to pay the back taxes plus an additional 25% of the original tax amount owed.