Back Tax Balance Reduced by 80%

Posted on August 12, 2015 by Kursti Nakagawa

Mr. C was referred to Professional Tax Resolution by a friend who had previously used our services. Having failed to respond to a Notice of Intent to Audit for tax year 2005, he had recently received an IRS Notice informing him that he owed over 150k in back taxes. On top of this, the IRS had initiated enforced collection activities to collect the tax amounts owed. In desperate need of professional tax settlement help, he contacted our firm.

At one time, Mr. C had a flourishing real estate company with offices in three states and a high gross profit. However,once the economy stopped booming, so did Mr. C’s businesses. By the time he contacted our firm, he was barely meeting his monthly expenses, let alone having sufficient funds to pay a large tax debt. After reviewing his financial information, our tax professionals decided that Mr. C would qualify for an Offer in Compromise in spite of the fact there were some special circumstances that we knew would make his case a hard sell with the IRS. Undeterred, our team set to work preparing his most recent corporate and personal tax returns and submitting his Offer in Compromise packet.

As we expected, the IRS questioned many actions of the taxpayer and facts of the case. They stated that Mr. C did not qualify for an Offer in Compromise because he had dissipated 401k assets that would have paid the tax liability in full after he had incurred the tax debt. In addition, they noted that he owned two corporations that could be sold to pay off the full amount of the outstanding tax liability. In response to their first concern, our professionals were able to show that all of the monies withdrawn from the 410k had been put into an income producing asset which was necessary for Mr. (Zoloft) C’s survival. They then went on to address the second concern by producing two business valuations which showed that the value of the business was only equal to the value of the business assets which was not enough to pay off the tax debt. In fact, by not backing down and doing the necessary legwork, our professionals were able to show that final value of all of Mr. C’s assets was approximately 27k, the exact amount of his compromise offer!

After the IRS had verbally agreed to accept the 27k offer, the tax resolution specialist stated that he wanted a collateral agreement based on future annual income over 50k. This would mean that if Mr. C made over 50k in one year, the income in excess of that amount would be taxed at a higher rate to pay off the old tax liability. Our professionals advised Mr. C that signing this agreement would not be in his best interest and quickly submitted a response to the IRS stating that 50k was not a reasonable amount. We were able to show that the client’s cost of living was over 50k and that the IRS had figured the amount incorrectly according to the Internal Revenue Service Manual. After a careful review of our response, the IRS adjusted the collateral agreement to begin at 95K, making it very unlikely that Mr. C would ever be required to pay more than the negotiated Offer in Compromise amount.

Although some tax settlement cases are cut and dried, most have extenuating circumstances that make them more difficult to resolve as was the case with M. C. This makes it important for a delinquent taxpayer to choose a tax resolution team that has a proven track record of negotiating successfully with the IRS. Professional Tax Resolution has such a record. Our staff prides themselves in keeping the client’s best interest in mind and achieving the best tax settlement possible for their specific set of circumstances.

If you have tax questions or a tax debt you are unable to pay, our tax settlement professionals are happy to discuss your tax resolution options free of charge. For more information about our services, visit us today at www.professionaltaxresolution.com or call us at 877.889.6527. With over 16 years in the business of resolving tax debt, we have a thorough understanding of tax law together with the experience to know which settlement option will be the best fit for your specific set of circumstances.

Tax Debt of $200k Settled for $1000!

Posted on July 22, 2015 by Kursti Nakagawa

Tax Debt of $200k Settled for $1000! Mr. W is a self-employed individual and the main provider for his family. As a member of the construction industry, his income fluctuates with the housing market which was in a downturn for an extended period of time. As a result, he had difficulty generating enough income to meet his minimum monthly expenses and was hit with one late payment notice after another. With all of his attention focused on keeping his family afloat, Mr. W did not file his tax returns for a number of years, thus acquiring a tax debt of over 200K. With a new edition to his family on the way and the IRS breathing down his neck, he was at loss as to what to do.

Faced with what he perceived as a desperate situation, Mr. W reached out to Professional Tax Resolution for help. During his initial phone consultation, our tax professionals were able to gather enough financial information to relieve some of his anxiety by explaining the available tax resolution options. Pleased with what he learned from this conversation, Mr. W scheduled a face to face appointment with a member of our tax resolution team. At this time, we were able to give him a full breakdown on how to resolve his back tax issues.

The IRS was taxing Mr. W based on his self-employment income without taking into account his business expenses. This naturally resulted in an extremely exaggerated tax liability. Although his business was putting out some very high income numbers, his personal net income was low due to high business expenses. This low income was the primary reason for his tight financial situation and the resulting debt accumulation.

Our tax professionals began the process of resolving Mr. W’s tax debt situation by filing all unfiled tax returns. Although this produced a much more accurate picture of his outstanding tax liability, it showed that he still owed the IRS more than 90K. Since this was an amount that far surpassed his ability to pay given his current income stream, we recommended that he follow up with an IRS Offer in Compromise.

Professional Tax Resolution gathered all of the information necessary to document his specific financial situation and to explain why he would be unable to pay the full amount of his back tax balance. After multiple communications and submitted documents, the IRS agreed to a negotiated Offer in Compromise amount of a mere $1,000!

Mr. W’s case was a financial worst case scenario. He had numerous unfiled tax returns as well late payments on previously filed returns. In addition, he lacked the money to pay the required amount once an accurate back tax balance had been obtained. Luckily, Professional Tax Resolution represented him throughout the entire ordeal. Not only did we reduce the amount he owed the IRS to less than 1% of the original back tax balance but we saved him time, allowing him to devote more energy to the business that would continue to earn him even more money! While not every case goes as smoothly as Mr. W’s, our professionals pledge to always go the extra mile for our clients and follow each case though until we achieve the best possible resolution.

Tax Fraud Brings Serious Consequences

Posted on July 15, 2015 by Kursti Nakagawa

Tax Fraud

Tax Fraud Brings Serious Consequences

It turns out that tax fraud brings serious consequences as evidenced by the sentencing, earlier this year, of Rashia Wilson to 21 years in prison for multiple counts of aggravated identity theft and wire fraud. Ms. Wilson, otherwise known as the “Tax Fraud Queen,” was originally convicted and sentenced in 2013 when she plead guilty to stealing over $3 million dollars in a tax refund scam. Her original sentence, which was thrown out on appeal in 2014 due to errors in applying sentencing guidelines, was reinstated earlier this year.

From April of 2009 through September of 2012, Rashia Wilson and several accomplices were successful in carrying out a scheme that defrauded the federal government of approximately $3.1 million in tax revenue. They did this by obtaining personal information from medical billing records and financial statements and using this to generate fraudulent tax returns without the knowledge or permission of the taxpayers whose information was being used. Once the returns were filed, they collected the tax refunds in the form of U.S. Treasury checks and prepaid debit cards. This scheme continued successfully for over three years and four tax seasons until investigators finally cracked the case in the fall of 2012. Throughout most of this time, Wilson bragged about her tax crimes on various social media sites and taunted the IRS, saying that they would not be able to indict her. In her own words, she proclaimed, “I’m Rashia,the queen of IRS tax fraud … So if you think indicting me will be easy, it won’t.”

The filing of false tax returns as Ms. Wilson and her accomplices did is treated very harshly by the legal system. While failing to file a return is considered a misdemeanor, the filing of a fraudulent return is a felony and is typically given a much more severe consequence. Although the national average sentence for identity theft is 43 months, the sentencing judge handed down a much longer sentence in the case of Rashia Wilson. U.S. As U.S. District Judge James Moody Jr. said at her sentencing hearing, “She knew she was doing wrong (and) … reveled in the fact that is was wrong.” He cited a formula that takes into account the seriousness of the offenses as well as the defendant’s prior criminal convictions as the reason for her harsh sentence.

In response to the case of Rashia Wilson and others like it, the IRS has stepped up its efforts to combat identity theft as well as other types of tax fraud. As recently as this week the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network issued a Geographic Targeting Order requiring check cashing companies in two Florida counties to verify the identification of any person cashing a federal income tax refund check. These types of restrictions are aimed at identifying and stopping tax fraud schemes such as the one described above.

Common Misconceptions about the IRS

Posted on May 5, 2015 by Kursti Nakagawa

A Few Common Misconceptions about the IRS

Audits are not as common as they may seem. Although many taxpayers worry that their tax return might be selected for an IRS audit, the fact is that less than two percent of personal tax returns are audited by the IRS each year. On top of this, even if a return is selected for further examination, the IRS usually just contacts the taxpayer by mail and asks them to provide documentation to support certain specific items. Following this communication (aptly labeled a correspondence audit), there are three possible outcomes, none of which are accompanied by a serious consequence. An additional tax amount will be assessed, the return will be accepted as originally submitted or, in some cases, a tax refund may even be issued.

Making an honest mistake on a tax return usually has no serious consequences. When

Common Misconceptions about the IRS

the IRS detects a mistake on a tax return, their normal procedure is to contact the taxpayer through some form of written communication and request that the error be corrected. Although the taxpayer will be expected to pay any additional tax amount owed, there is usually no penalty for making an honest mistake on a tax return. Taking legitimate tax deductions does not flag a return for audit. The tax code provides taxpayers with certain tax credits and tax deductions with the expectation that they will make use of them. In fact, provided that they have the necessary documentation, taxpayers should claim all tax credits and tax deductions to which they are entitled because, to not do so, almost certainly means that they will be paying a higher tax bill than they would otherwise need to pay. Unless that sum total of the tax breaks claimed on a return is excessive compared to the reported income, it is unlikely that they will cause the return to be flagged for an IRS audit.

It is better to file a tax return even when resources are not available to pay the taxes owed. Although the IRS assesses a penalty for failing to pay an outstanding tax liability, they assess an additional penalty for failing to file a tax return by the filing deadline. Because of this late filing penalty, it is always advisable for a taxpayer to either submit a completed tax return by the due date or apply for an automatic six-month extension even when funds are not available to pay tax amounts owed. By doing so, the taxpayer avoids the late filing penalty which is calculated as 5% of the back tax balance for each month or partial month that the return is late up to a maximum penalty of 25 %. Once the return has been filed, there are numerous options available for resolving any back tax balance. These include setting up a payment plan or negotiating one of the various other tax settlement options offered by the IRS.

The Tax Extension Option

Posted on April 12, 2015 by Kursti Nakagawa

The Tax Extension Option

Tax Extension is a Very Good Option!

You are not alone if you do not file your tax return on or before April 15th. Although this is the official deadline for the filing of personal tax returns, each year more and more people apply for an automatic six-month tax extension. The number of taxpayers requesting an extension increased from 11 million in 2011 to over 13 million in 2013, an increase of almost 20% over the two-year period! Another interesting fact is that, in tax year 2014, 25% of those individuals who had requested and extension were still working on their tax returns in September, just one month before the October 15^th extension deadline.

Although procrastination is one reason for requesting a tax extension, there are other factors that contribute to tax returns not getting filed by the April 15^th filing deadline. Several of those are highlighted below:

Lacking Necessary Tax Information
Although the deadline for the mailing of brokerage statements is February 15^th, the information these statements contain may not be correct. These initial statements often say that changes may be coming. The mailing of corrected 1099s can actually occur right up until April 15^th which does not give the taxpayer enough time to complete the tax return before the filing deadline.

Missing Required Tax Forms
If a taxpayer holds investments that are structured as partnerships, they must wait for the K-1 Forms that are based on partnership income. These partnerships must first finish their own tax returns which can be extended until September 15^th before these forms are generated. This means that partnership K-1 Forms could be in the hands of taxpayers as late as the month preceding the extension deadline.

Increased Complexity of Tax Code
The increased complexity of the tax code has made tax returns more and more difficult to complete which, in turn, has made it harder to get them submitted by the April 15^th tax filing deadline. In addition to the introduction of such changes as the net investment income tax, two different dividend tax rates and the alternative minimum tax, taxpayers must now report all overseas holdings. All of these changes require increased tax preparation time for certain categories of taxpayers which, in turn, has resulted in an increase in the number of requests for tax extensions.

Although filing a request for a tax extension does not relieve a taxpayer of the obligation to pay any taxes owed, it is definitely a better option than filing an incorrect or incomplete return. As long as the request for a tax extension is either e-filed or postmarked before the end of the day on April 15^th, it will allow the requesting taxpayer to avoid the late filing penalty which usually amounts to 5% of any unpaid tax balance for any month or partial month that the return is late. In addition, it will give the requesting individual six full months to submit a complete and correct tax return.