Author Archives: Kursti Nakagawa

FAQ about the IRS Notice of Deficiency

Posted on by

What is an IRS Notice of Deficiency?
A Notice of Deficiency is a formal letter from the IRS informing a taxpayer of a tax deficiency and advising them of their appeal rights with the United States Tax Court. It is required by law and is sent by registered or certified mail to the taxpayer’s last known address. Although a Notice of Deficiency can be issued when no tax return has been filed, it is most often sent when the tax amount shown on a submitted return is less than the actual amount owed according to IRS calculations.

What information is provided by an IRS Notice of Deficiency?
A Notice of Deficiency must include an explanation for the deficiency together with a statement of the tax, interest and penalties that have been assessed. The notice should also include the final date on which the taxpayer can file a petition with the United States Tax Court appealing the assessment. However, it should be noted that failure by the IRS to specify the last day on which to file a petition will not invalidate an otherwise valid deficiency notice if the taxpayer was not prejudiced by the omission.

How does a taxpayer respond to a Notice of Deficiency?
Within 90 days after a Notice of Deficiency is mailed (or within 150 days after mailing if the notice is addressed to a person outside the United States) the taxpayer must pay the assessed amount or file a petition with the Tax Court to contest the liability. Payment of the assessed amount after the deficiency notice is mailed does not deprive the Tax Court of jurisdiction over the deficiency. In addition, discussion of the case with the IRS during the 90 day period does not extend the time period during which a petition can be filed.

What are the consequences if a response is not submitted in a timely manner?
If the taxpayer does not file a Tax Court petition within the required time period, the appeal process is closed and IRS has the authority to collect the tax. Since the Tax Court is the only court that will hear the question of whether a tax liability is really owed, the taxpayer’s only option after the 90 day deadline has passed is to pay the assessed amount in full and then apply for a refund. If a response is not received within 90 days after the issuance of a Notice of Deficiency, the IRS is likely to issue a Notice to Levy. The Notice to Levy allows a 30 day response time, after which a taxpayer’s property may be seized to enforce collection if the assessed tax still has not been paid. The requirement to issue the Notice to Levy and wait 30 days does not apply if the IRS finds that the collection of tax is in jeopardy.

What are the advantages of obtaining the services of an experienced tax professional?
The IRS is authorized to collect taxes and issuing a Notice of Deficiency is the first step in the collection process. Receiving such a notice can be both intimidating and confusing and may make enlisting the help of a qualified tax professional a worthwhile investment. Collection of taxes by the IRS is permitted without proof of the debt so the burden rests with the taxpayer to determine whether the tax amount shown on the Notice of Deficiency is actually owed. Because of the complexities of tax law, accurately making this determination may require someone with both expert knowledge and experience. In addition, obtaining the help of a tax professional will ensure that the response to such a notice meets the IRS requirements and is submitted correctly, thus avoiding unpleasant consequences down the road.

If you have received a letter from the IRS such as a Notice of Deficiency or Notice to Levy or are threatened with a tax lien or wage garnishment, we can help stop the immediate collection action and help you work toward resolving your tax debt. Contact us today at (949) 596-4143 or info@protaxres.com to receive a free, no obligation consultation.

IRS Warning About Companies That Promise To Reduce Tax Debt – For a Large Fee

Posted on by

The IRS Wants You to Check Carefully Before Applying for an Offer in Compromise

The Internal Revenue Service has issued a consumer alert advising taxpayers to beware of tax settlement agencies that claim they can settle an outstanding tax debt for a small fraction of the amount owed through the through filing an application for an offer in compromise. While it is true that the IRS has the authority to settle federal tax liabilities for less than the full amount of the tax debt, the offer in compromise serves an important purpose for only a very select group of taxpayers. Commissioner Mark W. Everson recently warned consumers that the IRS is “increasingly concerned about unscrupulous promoters charging excessive fees to taxpayers who have no chance of meeting the program’s requirements.” He urged taxpayers with unresolved tax debt issues not to be fooled by high priced promises.

The bottom line is that if a tax settlement promise seems too easy and too good to be true, then it probably is. There are a few large marketing companies in the United States that are trying to take advantage of taxpayers who are faced with the very real, and very scary prospects of tax liens and wage garnishments. By preying upon those taxpayers in need through advertisements that promise enormous tax relief, they are not only misleading the public, but they end up costing those very vulnerable individuals time and money without ever really addressing the specifics of their tax debt. This is not to say that all tax settlement companies are unscrupulous, but the issue has become rampant enough that the IRS felt they needed to warn the public about this alarming practice.

The truth is that an offer in compromise will usually be considered only after other payment options have been exhausted. If a taxpayer is unable to pay their tax debt in full, there are other settlement options, such as monthly installment agreements, that must be explored before an offer in compromise can even be submitted. In actuality, tax settlements for very low proportions of tax debt are far more infrequent than the advertisements lead the consumer to believe and 100% tax relief is even less common.

Complete information on the tax collection process and various tax settlement and payment options is available on the IRS website (www.irs.gov). By reading through the agreement request qualifications provided on the site, the taxpayer may be able to determine if they qualify for a particular tax settlement option or payment plan. The website itself provides detailed instructions for submitting an offer in compromise and also includes all of the necessary financial forms. Of course, the many laws and regulations regarding the offer in compromise as well as other tax settlement options can be overwhelming so obtaining the help of a knowledgeable and qualified professional is often a worthwhile investment.

A qualified certified public accountant is probably the most desirable choice when seeking professional help with a tax debt issue. A CPA is the most likely professional to have a current knowledge of tax law and a thorough understanding of the policies and procedures of the IRS. An individual with this certification will also have the expertise and the experience to determine the true tax debt and to select the best method of tax relief for a specific set of circumstances. In order to locate a CPA in a specific geographical area, a taxpayer should contact the local or state tax professional association. Before actually hiring a CPA, it might also be a good idea to run a background check on the individual and also to verify their current licensure with the state certification agency and the Better Business Bureau. If references or referrals are available, it is a good idea to review these as well.

At Professional Tax Resolution, we welcome your inquiries and questions. We encourage you to read reviews from our clients as well as click our direct link to our rating with the BBB and the state licensure division. To learn more about how we can help you to remove tax liens, stop a wage garnishment, or find tax debt relief, call us today at (949) 596-4143 for your free no obligation consultation.

Understanding The Three Settlement Types for an Offer in Compromise

Posted on by

The Offer in Compromise is a specific tax relief option made available by the IRS through which a taxpayer offers the IRS a certain amount of money in exchange for which the IRS agrees to cancel the taxpayer’s outstanding tax debt. While it is an effective tax settlement option for a very specific group of taxpayers, the Offer in Compromise definitely does not represent a blanket solution for anyone with an outstanding tax liability. The acceptance criteria are very explicit and, since many applications are submitted that do not meet the published IRS guidelines, the rejection rate is high. When considering filing an application for an IRS Offer in Compromise it is important, not only to understand the specific qualifying criteria, but also to be familiar with the available settlement alternatives.

There are three payment options available for an IRS Offer in Compromise. An application requesting any one of the three payment plans requires a $150 application fee (unless the taxpayer submitting the application qualifies for a low income waiver or is submitting the application for the reason that he or she doubts they actually owe the outstanding tax debt). All three tax settlement options require an initial payment (unless the taxpayer qualifies for a low income waiver) followed by a lump sum or a specific set of scheduled installments. The plans vary as to the calculation of the settlement amount, the amount of the initial payment, the number of periodic payments and the time period over which those payments will be made.

The three settlement alternatives for an Offer in Compromise are summarized below:

1) Lump Sum Cash Payment
• Generally requires a 20% payment upon the filing of the application with the balance paid within five months of acceptance. Low income taxpayers may be exempt from the initial payment requirement.

2) Short Term Periodic Payment
• Payments are made in monthly installments with the balance being paid in full within 24 months of the IRS receiving the Offer in Compromise. Taxpayers must generally make the proposed monthly payments while the IRS considers the offer unless they qualify for the low income waiver.

3) Deferred Periodic Payment
• Payments are made in monthly installments with the balance being paid in full in 25 months or more but within the statutory collection period. Taxpayers must generally make the proposed monthly payments while the IRS considers the offer unless they qualify for the low income waiver.

The flexibility of the settlement alternatives available for an Offer in Compromise makes it a viable and effective tax relief alternative for taxpayers with varying financial situations. However, since the Offer in Compromise involves a settlement for an amount less than what the taxpayer actually owes, it can be difficult to obtain. The IRS will carefully review the available assets and income of the taxpayer and the taxpayer’s ability to pay the original tax debt. During the review of a submitted Offer in Compromise by the IRS, all other collection activity will stop. The job of a qualified tax resolution firm is to assist in demonstrating a taxpayer’s inability to pay the full amount of his or her tax debt and to prove that it is in the best interest of the IRS to accept an offer for less than the full amount.

When selecting this tax relief option and the accompanying payment plan, the taxpayer should be well aware that it is an official contract with the IRS and comes with a specific set of financial responsibilities. If an individual entering into an Offer in Compromise fails to comply with any of the contractual provisions set forth in the agreement, the IRS will probably revoke the contract and reinstate the full amount of the original tax debt.

The Offer in Compromise is one of numerous tax relief options open to a taxpayer who may be facing an impending tax lien, tax levy or wage garnishment due to a large outstanding tax debt. For help in determining whether your tax debt situation meets the acceptance criteria for an Offer in Compromise and whether it is the best tax settlement option for your specific needs, contact an experienced tax professional at www.professionaltaxresolution.com.

Another Tax Settlement Option – A Partial Payment Installment Agreement

Posted on by

Due to the current economic climate, more taxpayers are finding themselves with significant outstanding tax debt. Many taxpayers owe both the Internal Revenue Service and their state (or states) for multiple years. Some taxpayers are simply overwhelmed by the numerous IRS Notices and Letters from the IRS that they receive. In actuality, there are numerous ways to resolve outstanding tax liabilities. However many taxpayers chose the worst choice of action; which is to do nothing. Taxpayers that simply do not respond to attempts to collect outstanding debts debt find themselves the subject of increasingly more aggressive collection efforts by the IRS and State tax agencies. Eventually the IRS and State tax agencies will resort to filing tax levies and tax liens on bank accounts and properties or start a wage garnishment in attempt to collect the outstanding tax debt. Unfortunately due to the amount of time that has passed since the initial notice, many taxpayers are shocked to find that the balances owed may have increased by 50% or more due to the various penalties and interest assessed.

A fairly new and less used IRS tax settlement option is the Partial Payment Installment Agreement. The IRS implemented this additional payment option, on January 17, 2005, specifically for taxpayers who have outstanding federal tax debt. The legislation includes language amending Internal Revenue Code and allows the IRS to enter into installment agreements that result in full or partial payment of the tax debt. What is so different is that prior to enactment of this 2004/2005 legislation, taxpayers who could not fully pay their outstanding tax liabilities could only enter into an installment agreement with the IRS for full payment of the liability. For those with limited monthly cash flow, this left some unable to meet the repayment plan criterion and put them at risk for default.

For those with an inability to pay the full balance of a tax debt, prior to the partial payment installment agreement, the only option to settle a tax debt was the Offer in Compromise. The process of submitting an offer in compromise is generally more involved than the partial payment installment agreement. Of course both tax settlement options are carefully reviewed by the IRS and acceptance is limited to taxpayers that can clearly demonstrate the inability to settle tax liabilities in full.

Taxpayers who are being considered for a partial payment installment agreement to settle an outstanding tax debt must be able to provide complete and accurate financial information that will be carefully reviewed and verified. Taxpayers will also be expected to use equity in assets to reduce or fully pay the amount of the outstanding tax debt liability.

In addition, taxpayers granted partial payment installment agreements will be subject to a complete financial review every two years. As a result of this review, the amount of the installment payments could increase or the agreement could be terminated, if the taxpayer’s financial condition improves.

While the partial payment installment agreement has drawbacks, it does provide taxpayers with another tax settlement option. A qualified tax settlement firm can help you evaluate your specific situation and present you with your options to revolve your outstanding tax debt.

Visit www.professionaltaxresolution.com for more information about the qualifications for tax debt relief through a partial payment installment agreement or other tax settlement options.

Learn How the IRS Grants An Abatement of Penalties

Posted on by

Penalties in the form of interest and other fees are incurred when a taxpayer fails to file a tax return by a filing deadline and/or fails to pay a tax debt when it is due. Although interest and other penalties assessed by the IRS function to create equity within the tax system and encourage compliance, they often impose a significant financial burden on the taxpayer by increasing a taxpayer’s IRS tax debt by as much as fifty percent. When the circumstances are such that a taxpayer has acted in a reasonable and prudent manner yet, because of circumstance beyond his or her control, is unable to meet a tax debt obligation, the IRS may reduce or eliminate the penalties.
The IRS grants the abatement of penalties when “the taxpayer exercises ordinary business care and prudence in determining their tax obligations but is unable to comply with those obligations.” This is called Reasonable Cause Relief. Essentially this means that something beyond the control of the taxpayer has occurred that caused him or her not to file a tax return or pay a tax debt in a timely fashion. In order to qualify for Reasonable Cause Relief, it must be demonstrated that the taxpayer took reasonable steps to counter the events that resulted in his or her inability to pay and yet was still unable meet the assessed tax obligations.
Unfortunately, despite what some tax relief or tax settlement companies might advertise, abatement through Reasonable Cause Relief is very difficult to obtain. The burden of proof that requisite care and prudence was exercised rests with the taxpayer. In addition, the following prerequisites must be met in order to be considered by the IRS as a candidate for Reasonable Cause Relief:
• The taxpayer or the tax settlement representative must make a request for abatement.

• The taxpayer’s situation must be the result of, or closely analogous to, one of the following events:

  • Inability to obtain necessary records
  • Serious illness, death, or other unavoidable absence
  • Fire, casualty, natural disaster or other disturbance
  • Incorrect advice from a competent tax professional
  • Incorrect advice, either oral or written, from the IRS
  • An Act of God.

• The taxpayer must meet the IRS standards of burden of proof regarding one or more of these events.

A qualified Certified Public Accountant handling a tax settlement case will know and understand the factors the IRS considers when determining whether a taxpayer is eligible for Reasonable Cause Relief and will make sure the case is well prepared before approaching the IRS.

The following is a sample list of questions the IRS may present when making a determination as to whether or not to grant an abatement:

  • What events prevented the timely filing of a tax document or resulted in the late payment of a tax debt?
  • When did the events happen?
  • ?Why did these events prevent the taxpayer from complying with the tax law?
  • How were other financial affairs handled during the time period in question?
  • Does it appear that the taxpayer paid other creditors and singled out the IRS as the creditor not to be paid?
  • What steps were taken in an attempt to mitigate the circumstances that prevented payment of the tax debt?
  • Is there a direct “timeline” correlation between the extenuating circumstances and the failure to meet the tax debt obligations in question?
  • Is there a history of late payment of tax debt and /or failure to meet filing deadlines?
  • Were the circumstances such that they could not have been anticipated or avoided?
  • What documentation was provided to prove reasonable cause?
  • Was the documentation provided by an uninterested third party?

Call us at (949)-596-4143 for more information about tax debt, tax relief, tax settlement, tax levies, wage garnishment, audit defense or removal of tax liens.