Case In Point-Hiring A Qualified Professional To Handle Your Tax Settlement = A Good Investment

Although the IRS has numerous programs to assist taxpayers in settling outstanding tax debts, deciding which option to use is not always an easy task. Very specific acceptance criteria must be met in order for an application for tax relief to have any chance of being accepted. In addition, the process of filing the initial paperwork and documentation and following up by submitting the required responses to communication from the IRS can be lengthy and challenging. During the time a tax settlement application is under consideration, interest and penalties can accrue. If the settlement offer is then rejected, not only has there been a waste of time and energy on the part of the taxpayer, but the actual amount of the tax debt may have increased making the taxpayer’s financial situation worse.

Below is the detail of an interesting IRS Tax Court case in which the IRS Appeals Office failed to grant a taxpayer’s request for tax debt relief. The case is interesting because it highlights a number of the potential filing problems described in the preceding paragraph. Susan Fay Mostafa, the taxpayer in question, neglected to verify that she met the acceptance criteria for the type of tax debt assistance she was requesting. Her initial error was then compounded when she failed to file a formal request for tax relief on the correct IRS form and then did not respond to several official IRS letters and notices in an appropriate and timely manner.

The Case of Susan Fay Mostafa

• She received an IRS Notice of Deficiency for $1377 for a 1996 tax return that had not been filed. The notice stated that she was also liable for a 25% failure to file penalty.
• Although she submitted a Tax Court petition to challenge the deficiency notice, she later received an IRS notice of Intent to Levy.
• She then challenged the proposed levy by requesting a hearing with the IRS Appeals Office.
• At the same time, she wrote a check to the IRS for $701 and wrote on the check that endorsing it would mean accepting the 1996 tax return as Paid in Full.
• Once the amount of the check was credited to her account, she spoke with the appeals officer several times indicating that she considered her case closed since the IRS had cashed her check.
• In spite of the payment and the subsequent communication, the IRS Tax Court ruled against her.
• After considering all of the trial evidence, the Court of Appeals argued that she had not followed the specific IRS procedures for submitting an Offer in Compromise and had not received either an IRS letter or an IRS notice indicating that such an offer had been accepted.

The Tax Court case outlined above clearly shows that the assistance of a qualified tax settlement specialist may be helpful when submitting an application for tax debt assistance to the IRS. Each year many taxpayers who truly meet the qualification criteria for specific IRS tax relief programs have their applications rejected for one or more of the following reasons:

• failure to meet the acceptance criteria for a selected settlement option
• failure to file a request for assistance using the correct IRS form(s)
• failure to complete the required IRS form(s)correctly
• failure to provide all of the necessary supporting documentation
• failure to conform to the IRS time constraints for submitting forms and documentation
• failure to respond to formal IRS letters and notices in an appropriate and timely manner

Susan Fay Mostafa made all of the above errors when she tried to resolve her tax debt situation without the assistance of a qualified tax specialist. When the IRS Tax Court denied her appeal, she was no better off than she had been when she submitted her initial Tax Court petition. Had she enlisted the help of a tax professional, it would have been that person’s job to adequately document her inability to pay the full amount of her tax debt. Following that, it would have been the specialist’s responsibility to submit the request for relief with the accompanying documentation, to respond to follow-up communication from the IRS in an appropriate and timely manner and to advocate for Ms. Mostafa before the United States Tax Court.

The bottom line is not to try to handle a complex tax settlement case alone. Hire the right professional to help you achieve tax debt relief. Visit www.professinoaltaxresolution.com for more information about tax settlement options and contact us today at (949)-596-4143 or info@protaxres.com to receive a free, no obligation consultation.

Consider Carrying Back a Net Operating Loss as a Tax Settlement Tool

The Net Operating Loss Carry Back is a tax relief option that allows a taxpayer to reduce an existing tax liability by applying net operating losses for the current fiscal year against gains from previous years. In light of the recent economic downturn, is not uncommon for allowable deductions in any given year to exceed gross income, thus resulting in an operating loss. By the same token, it is a fairly common occurrence in the current economic environment for a taxpayer to have paid taxes on substantial net income in past years and yet have incurred financial losses for the current year. This is the set of financial circumstances for which the Net Operating Loss Carry Back provision was designed.

The Net Operating Loss Carry Back is dissimilar to several of the other tax settlement options offered by the IRS in that it is a tax relief alternative that is available to any taxpayer, regardless of their financial situation. Unlike the Offer in Compromise and the Partial Payment Installment Agreement, there are no specific qualifying criteria. Because of this difference, it is always advantageous to use the Net Operating Loss Carry Back option whenever the financial circumstances are such that there has been a financial loss in any given year following gains in previous years. In recognition of the current economic climate, the IRS has made the use of this carry back option even more attractive by instituting steps to accelerate the payment of any refunds generated by offsetting a prior year’s tax liability. For certain specific situations, the IRS has also extended the time period over which that loss can be offset.

Of course the use of Net Operating Loss Carry Back is subject to the same scrutiny as that of a regularly filed tax return. When this offset is requested, IRS will look carefully at the current year’s tax return together with returns that were filed during the carry back period. Great care should be exercised to make sure all of these returns have been filed correctly and any necessary amendments to previous returns have been submitted according to established IRS guidelines. As with any of the tax settlement options, enlisting the help of a qualified tax specialist to assist in this process might very well prove to be a worthwhile investment. Although the IRS has made changes to the Net Operating Loss Carry Back option in order better accommodate the needs of taxpayers in the current economic climate, it nevertheless has not compromised its existing requirements for thoroughness and accuracy.

Visit www.professionaltaxresolution.com for more information about customized tax debt relief assistance. With over 16 years of experience, we have a thorough understanding of tax law together with the experience to know which tax settlement option will best meet the specific needs of each of our clients. Contact us today at (949)-596-4143 or info@protaxres.com to receive a free, no obligation consultation.

2010 Electric Car Credit and Other Tax Incentives

There are a variety of reasons why taxpayers might find themselves with a significant amount of tax debt. Many individuals have outstanding tax liabilities because they have failed to file income tax returns or report portions of their income. In other situations, taxpayers have filed their returns but have done so incorrectly or relied upon the services of unqualified tax preparers who have made filing errors. At Professional Tax Resolution, our services go beyond those of a traditional tax settlement firm. Our goal is to stop collection activity, resolve any existing tax debt issues, and then work with the client to ensure that a problem situation does not repeat itself.

The government provides various types of tax credits to stimulate demand for certain products and industries. Most recently the IRS and various states have encouraged home sales and the purchase of energy efficient vehicles and appliances through the use of tax credits. While these incentives can provide taxpayers with substantial tax advantages, they can have devastating effects if they are filed incorrectly. It is not uncommon for our firm to meet with a new client who has been in tax compliance in the past but is now faced with a tax debt that is due to the incorrect filing of a tax return or an error in the reporting of a tax credit. If a tax credit is filed incorrectly, the IRS typically will not identify the error and disallow the credit until a year, or possibly two, after the filing of the original tax return. By this time, various types of filing, payment and accuracy related penalties and interest have often been applied to the outstanding tax debt. These assessments can add up to amounts that taxpayers simply are unable to pay.

Last year the IRS published numerous news articles about the fraud and improper filing of the $8,000 First-Time Homebuyer Credit. This year it is publishing similar articles about the misunderstanding and fraud related to the $7,500 electric drive motor vehicle credit. While taxpayers should certainly take advantage of these potentially lucrative tax incentives, they should also take care to make sure that they are in fact eligible for them and that they are properly filed.

Automobile companies are just beginning to mass market electric cars in response to increased consumer demand. This is at least partially a response to the lucrative tax incentives being offered by the Federal Government. President Obama is pushing to have a million electric cars on the road by 2015 and tax incentives are a large part of the strategy designed to make that number a reality. At present a $7,500 tax credit is available to any consumer purchasing an electric drive motor vehicle and additional credits are being offered to anyone who converts an existing gasoline powered automobile to plug-in.

Although the tax breaks may be serving their purpose in increasing demand for electric vehicles, a Treasury Department review revealed that thousands of taxpayers have claimed the credits for vehicles that don’t qualify. In fact, estimates indicate that over 20% of approximately $160 million in electric car tax credits claimed for the first half of 2010 were claimed in error. In response to the Treasury Department’s findings, the Inspector General has made numerous recommendations for recovering the wrongfully-claimed credits and for improving the reporting methods so as to avoid false claims in the future. The IRS has concurred, saying that it has taken “aggressive steps” to safeguard against improper payments as well as to “recapture the credits people erroneously claimed.”

At Professional Tax Resolution, we have the knowledge and experience to ensure that all of our clients’ tax filings are submitted accurately and according to established IRS guidelines. If a tax debt situation already exists, our experienced CPA’s will take the time to thoroughly analyze it in order to bring about resolution using the best tax settlement option available. The bottom line is not to try to handle a complex tax settlement case alone.

Visit www.professionaltaxresolution.com for more information about tax settlement options or contact us today at (949)-596-4143 to receive a free, no obligation consultation.

FAQ about An Offer In Compromise

What is an Offer in Compromise?
An Offer in Compromise is an agreement between a taxpayer and the Internal Revenue Service that settles a tax debt for less than the amount owed.

What do you do first?
A taxpayer submits an Offer in Compromise by completing two standardized forms and collecting all of the required supporting documentation. A check list identifying the necessary documentation is provided with the application.

Why should you take care to fill everything out correctly?
If an Offer in Compromise is not submitted according to the published IRS requirements and procedures, it can result in the delay or denial of the offer even if the taxpayer might otherwise qualify. The Offer in Compromise application must be submitted in writing, signed by the taxpayer (under penalty of perjury), and must contain all of the information required by the IRS. When the offer is submitted solely on the basis of doubt as to the taxpayer’s liability, there is no requirement to provide financial statements.

What happens after the offer has been submitted?
An Offer in Compromise attains a status of pending when it is accepted for processing by the IRS. As might be expected, the IRS generally will not accept an offer for processing if there is a related criminal case with the Department of Justice. Once submitted, if an offer does not contain all of the required information and documentation, the IRS will request that the taxpayer provide whatever is missing. If the requested information is not provided in a timely manner, the application may be returned. The IRS will deny an Offer in Compromise if it determines that the offer was submitted solely for the purpose of delaying collection of the tax debt.

What if you decide to withdraw your offer?
An Offer in Compromise may be withdrawn by the taxpayer at any time prior to acceptance of the offer by the IRS. It will be considered withdrawn upon the receipt by the IRS of written notification of the withdrawal. An official withdrawal of an Offer in Compromise may be made by personal delivery, certified mail, or upon issuance of a letter from the IRS confirming the taxpayer’s intent to withdraw the offer.

How will you know that your offer for tax settlement has been accepted?
An Offer in Compromise is considered accepted when the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative receives a written Notice of Acceptance from the IRS. As a condition of acceptance, the IRS may request that the taxpayer enter into a collateral agreement if it is deemed necessary for the protection of the interests of the United States. For instance, if the final payment on an accepted Offer in Compromise is contingent upon the simultaneous release of a tax lien, that payment must be made in accordance with the forms, instructions and procedures prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury.

What is the end result?
Acceptance of an Offer in Compromise will settle the tax debt of the taxpayer (or taxpayers) designated on the application for the dollar amount specified in the offer. The acceptance of an Offer in Compromise for one taxpayer does settle the tax liability of any person not named in the offer.

Why should you consider hiring a tax professional?

The process of obtaining an Offer in Compromise can be difficult and time consuming. When it involves tax debts related to multiple years and/or multiple taxpayers and tax liens or tax levies, the process can be increasingly difficult. A qualified tax resolution specialist can be helpful, first, in determining if a taxpayer meets the acceptance criteria for an Offer in Compromise and, following that, in completing the application according to IRS specifications. A tax specialist will also have the knowledge to accurately calculate and document a taxpayer’s inability to pay the full amount of the tax debt so that the offer will have a reasonable chance of being accepted by the IRS.

IRS Warning About Companies That Promise To Reduce Tax Debt – For a Large Fee

The IRS Wants You to Check Carefully Before Applying for an Offer in Compromise

The Internal Revenue Service has issued a consumer alert advising taxpayers to beware of tax settlement agencies that claim they can settle an outstanding tax debt for a small fraction of the amount owed through the through filing an application for an offer in compromise. While it is true that the IRS has the authority to settle federal tax liabilities for less than the full amount of the tax debt, the offer in compromise serves an important purpose for only a very select group of taxpayers. Commissioner Mark W. Everson recently warned consumers that the IRS is “increasingly concerned about unscrupulous promoters charging excessive fees to taxpayers who have no chance of meeting the program’s requirements.” He urged taxpayers with unresolved tax debt issues not to be fooled by high priced promises.

The bottom line is that if a tax settlement promise seems too easy and too good to be true, then it probably is. There are a few large marketing companies in the United States that are trying to take advantage of taxpayers who are faced with the very real, and very scary prospects of tax liens and wage garnishments. By preying upon those taxpayers in need through advertisements that promise enormous tax relief, they are not only misleading the public, but they end up costing those very vulnerable individuals time and money without ever really addressing the specifics of their tax debt. This is not to say that all tax settlement companies are unscrupulous, but the issue has become rampant enough that the IRS felt they needed to warn the public about this alarming practice.

The truth is that an offer in compromise will usually be considered only after other payment options have been exhausted. If a taxpayer is unable to pay their tax debt in full, there are other settlement options, such as monthly installment agreements, that must be explored before an offer in compromise can even be submitted. In actuality, tax settlements for very low proportions of tax debt are far more infrequent than the advertisements lead the consumer to believe and 100% tax relief is even less common.

Complete information on the tax collection process and various tax settlement and payment options is available on the IRS website (www.irs.gov). By reading through the agreement request qualifications provided on the site, the taxpayer may be able to determine if they qualify for a particular tax settlement option or payment plan. The website itself provides detailed instructions for submitting an offer in compromise and also includes all of the necessary financial forms. Of course, the many laws and regulations regarding the offer in compromise as well as other tax settlement options can be overwhelming so obtaining the help of a knowledgeable and qualified professional is often a worthwhile investment.

A qualified certified public accountant is probably the most desirable choice when seeking professional help with a tax debt issue. A CPA is the most likely professional to have a current knowledge of tax law and a thorough understanding of the policies and procedures of the IRS. An individual with this certification will also have the expertise and the experience to determine the true tax debt and to select the best method of tax relief for a specific set of circumstances. In order to locate a CPA in a specific geographical area, a taxpayer should contact the local or state tax professional association. Before actually hiring a CPA, it might also be a good idea to run a background check on the individual and also to verify their current licensure with the state certification agency and the Better Business Bureau. If references or referrals are available, it is a good idea to review these as well.

At Professional Tax Resolution, we welcome your inquiries and questions. We encourage you to read reviews from our clients as well as click our direct link to our rating with the BBB and the state licensure division. To learn more about how we can help you to remove tax liens, stop a wage garnishment, or find tax debt relief, call us today at (949) 596-4143 for your free no obligation consultation.